วีดีโอ

life must be so hard you have to do this .

I need one of these for my lawn mower. Musk keeps pushing engineering at any costs.

What flight 6 failure ? flight 6 was a 100% success, the tower had an issue which caused the booster to be commanded to land just off shore.

it would be nice if your visuals matched what you were saying more. but great information. i have been following the starship program since sn 15, and it is amazing to see how far we have come. 2:25 from farmers welding basic prototypes in a field to 2:56 professionals in stat of the art facilities

Well Duaa where the hell you been.!!🙄

Im the first woohoo 🎉🎉. Lets build HLS this year

Tax write-off?

BO is a scam

Wow!😅 E User#michaeleblake35

HELLO MAHAL👩‍❤️‍👨💞☕❤️🕺PANG ELON NAKITA NIMO MGA DAGKONG BOOK NAA AKUNG GAMITON MAGHIMO TANAN MARKETING DAX TANAN LISOD TANAN SABTON KAY GERMAN LANGUAGES TANAN NAA KO NAA GAHIMO OG MARKETING DAX GAATUBANG NAKO NA ANG DAGKONG BOOK BUSA IMONG KWARTA DILI NIMO IHATAG KAY LISOD KAAYO AKUNG UTOK GAHIMO TANAN OG DAX NIMO MAHAL PALAGING LAB LAB KAAYONG HONEYDARLING❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Jeff Bezos sure talks a lot.

The only thing they are testing is my patience!

What test? It doesn't have any engines. Just blue covers, to make it look pretty. Just stop talking about BLUE BOZO.

IFT7 launch will happen in January 2025.

😊😮😊

Jarred was the best pick for Nasa. He has many credentials supporting his position.

🙄

So 😎

Why so Sirius

Blue has completely relied on historicle testing. Where does inovation and creativety come from? Ula also relies completely on tried and tested knowledge. How can Blue expect to fly successfully on the very first attempt? It boggles my mind. How can Ula and Blue expect to reliably keep pace?

Make no mistake about it, I am primarily a fan of Space X. However, I dearly hope to see BO successfully get New Glenn into LEO early 2025. Picture two people deciding between two different routes to a destination about 60 minutes away. One route is only about 30 miles away, but the road is an unkempt gravel road with potholes and large rocks along the way. The other route is about 60 miles long, less direct but via a paved well kept surface. Elon takes the risk choosing an off road vehicle trying to go the 30 miles at 30 mph. with high risk. Bezos elects to use a reliable town car to cruise the longer 60 mile route at a smooth 60 mph with a lower risk. Who wins? Either could win. A lot depends on the weather and other changing conditions in the roads. The key is both have a valid method of getting to the destination in 60 min. Space X is taking huge potential risks via rapid iteration. Blue Origin is attempting high precision from the start. I've worked in various companies and have experienced the high risk tolerance vs the low risk tolerance methods. I've seen both work well and both fail. In the case of Space X vs. Blue Origin, I would suggest that there will be several more failures for SX before success happens and BO is more likely to have their first attempt, maybe 2nd, be successful. Yet, the timeline may be similar in the end. I do think it's great that Elon is basically more transparent than Jeff. Although I may favor Space X, I have to also say I hope they both become the leaders in space travel and exploration in the not so far away future. I could write a book on why I would like to see both companies excel. The short story is because I'm an American and they are American companies. The long story includes the collaboration between the American companies along with NASA, the Space Force and the DOD. Imagine the US Navy. Yeah, they are mostly carriers, battleships, submarines and etc. But the unsung heroes are the Navy hospital ships that in time of war save lives of our soldiers and even those of our enemies. In the meantime, during peace, they travel the world helping battle diseases, poverty stricken nations with starving and sick children and have helped provide relief to areas in the world devastated by disasters. Imagine the USSF (US Space Force) being something like the Navy in space in a future where many hundreds to thousands of people live and work in space (off world). And example taste of the future: Medical research stations 3-D printing organs to replace one's own dying liver, kidney, heart, lung, etc. with new organs grown with our own DNA. In micro gravity this is already possible in a limited form. With earths' gravity, it is nearly impossible. By the way, America First....absolutely. Only if we make our own nation healthy as individuals and as a nation, can we ever hope to have the real power to help peoples of other nations in need. The space frontier offers the potential for a healthy nation far beyond what most Americans believe or understand.

I think they're hopelessly behind schedule at the moment, and likely won't meet most of their current commitments. But I don't see why they can't be successful in the long run. And it would be good for the US to have two dynamic private space companies.

Underlying causes? Jeff Bozos.

BO is never going to compete in the space race.😂

Another Pisin contest. I can't wait till X is beyond copying. Todays progress is pure genius. On the other hand how far can we let Musk to go. I mean everything he touches turns to gold and is far ahead of current industry. How much power should a man have over the rest of mankind???. I need to stop thinking too much.

6 months old “breakthrough”

New Glenn Rocket is a laughing stock...

There is nothing to copy from Blue Origin, it is only capable of sub orbital launches, and....idiotic space tourism.

Space X Is Huge!!!

You cant copy your way into the lead

BYD to TELSA another humiliation🤓🤓🤓

Using kinetic energy is a very good way of reducing fuel costs. Rocket propulsion can be used in later stages of flight. This is a good idea for a propulsion system

Spin launch seems like a fantastic way of transferring small loads periodically to low earth orbit. It could be a cost efficient orbital weapons system and it could be effective for hurling series of fuel tanks into orbit so they can fuel larger ships. There's no reason why the 500,000 cost can't be reduced

What kind of affect would this have on a living body, I think that the g force generated by the spinning launch would be more than we could tolerate safely.

You'll never get anyone to ride in that thing.

By itself at sea level its a dead idea, combine it with rocket fuel and launch from high altitude then maybe, if you can overcome the engineering challenges like precision release and G forces. I would think a better idea would be a rail gun sled up the side of a mountain.

This can never work at sea level, it has a chance at above 22,000 to 25,000 feet(wearing oxygen for staff) this lower density air has less drag and MIGHT work.

When released from the tether, the projectile has angular velocity as well as linear velocity. The angular velocity remeins unchanged due to conservation of angular momentum. Therefore the projectile must continue to rotate and so topple end over end as it travels.

Spinlaunch on moon or even on Mars will be very cost effective to send cargo to orbiting ships or even directly to where ever

WTF is Wrong with BF Starship ? .... If the BF Booster has the pinpoint Accuracy to Land in the arms of the BF Chopsticks ? .... Why Can't they Land the Starship in the Exact Spot they want on the Indian Ocean ?? ... right next to a SpaceX Salvage Boat ! ..... Don't they do that 5 times a week with the Falcon Rockets ? ... Recovering landed Rockets should be routine for SpaceX ..... So why all the Drama , Bot Boay ? ..... 😕

🤪👉Cuándo sincronisaran la teletranportacion con esté varato lansador desde un rascacielos 🤪😜

Spin Launch is a Stewpid Idea , and will Never Work ! ... Why ? ... because it uses All its Speed , Energy , Acceleration , at the beginning and Slows down on the way Up ... Whereas , a Rocket gains Speed and Momentum as it goes up , allowing it to reach and maintain Orbital Velocity ! ... Plus the Dart , Engines , Fuel and Cargo require , Extreme Engineering to survive the tremendous centrifugal forces ! Therefore Expensive ! :-[

No , i don't know yet , about the ship , i am learning by watching still

OK -------- . The HIGH bay is the perfect size for RAPID Check Out (not refurbishment) and Loading Cargo Onto Starships between Launches and cannot be replaced without high cost and waste of time. With the Area the High Bay now sits on being too small for the Size the GIGA BAY SpaceX needs to Efficiently contain at least 20 Starship/Boosters during Construction to produce 100 Starships a year. With 30+ more likely... Unless the Recently Completed Parking structure is destroyed along with the High Bay. Increasing the time it takes for workers to walk from their cars to their JOBS all across the Complex, Decreasing Productivity... Not to mention, that using the current long transporters to move Starships and Boosters between stations spread out in many Separate distant small Giga bays would add cost and time for constructing each Starship/Booster.. ------------ . By constructing the GEGA BAY West of the existing MEGA BAYS or even South, SpaceX has plenty of Room for the size of the GEGA BAY they must have with a central transport Isle between two rows of Starship/Booster Construction Stations under one Roof.. With a central overhead crane system for quickly transporting Starsships between stations using their Lift/Landing side Pegs. While reducing the WASTE of time and Cost of both workers getting to work from the Centrally located Parking structure and Starships/Boosters being moved from station to station by transporters and or moving Construction Machinery and Processing Equipment between Starship/Boosters on fixed stations as they are needed...!!! While some Assembly processes need fixed stations most work can be done cheaply by moving the smaller needed equipment between ships allowing differently designed Starships such as Tankers, Lunar Landers, Lunar Habitats, Orbital Stations, Earth Orbit Lifters and Mars Ships that would take their own processes and time to not hold up a fixed static production line or the added cost of constantly moving Ships when a few smaller pieces of construction equipment (even if they weigh hundreds of tons) are easier and faster to move with the over head cranes... Allowing Cheap copies of Some equipment to work on multiple ships without waiting for a single ship to finish and move..Especially with unseen delays and if the same equipment is needed multiple times during construction between other processes that would have required the ship to be moved each time. ----------- . A mile-long GEGA BAY is preferable to dozens and DOZENS of the smaller GEGA BAYS scattered across square miles exposing half-built Starships to the nasty unpredictable Wearther of the GULF Coast of Texas that would be needed for building the thousands of SpaceX Starshjps that will be Demanded once the RICHES of Earth Orbit, Mars and the Solar System is Realized with the Reduction of cost below Airliner rates...

They need a functional respective starship first.!!😉

I like Rockets. Happy turkey Day to all!

Monumental! Always upgrade, use waste to fuel; look forward, Ignore the chaff; keep focused; Bring ON the Gigabay!

Trump canceling SLS and Starliner (Boeing contracts) will pay for the whole Dragonfly mission. Thank D.O.G.E in advance.

These BF Rockets need to be Toughened Up to ever be Reusable ... that's going to add a lot of unwanted Weight ... These flimsy tin cans . bend , fall apart and leak everywhere ! .... That's No Good and could lead to a Deadly Disaster ! .... and that brings back NASA and the FAA ..... :-[

The Boca Chica Circus seems to get more Bizarre everyday ! ... Now Madman Musk is shooting his floating BF Boosters with Military Jets to help them Sink ! .... Unbelievable ! SpaceX needs to tighten up its Leaky Fuel Systems ! .... They have too many Residual Flames and Fires going on , looking to cause Problems .... :-[