GLOBALISTS WILL USE IT TO ENSLAVE US - ITS SIMPLY A TOOL FOR GOOD OR EVIL. OUR ONLY TRUE HOPE IS SUPER INTELLIGENCE WILL NOT ALLOW US TO USE IT FOR EVIL.
I'm in tears... yes... we are going to be so nostalgic for this time. We don't even know what truly lies ahead but it will be so beyond where we are in this very moment. Now is the time to count your blessings and reconnect with family and those who you care about.
Many people are dying of incurable sicknesses and modern medical science is helpless of mental and chronic illnesses. AI is making it worse. AI can do everything except save people's lives. AI ChatGPT will destroy the whole world not by violence or outsmarting them but by giving people the impression that they know when they don't. They never know they are being misled. People can never know who they are internally; they can only have textbooks and limited conventional knowledge about inner human consciousness and spirituality. People become more ignorant but think they are wise. False knowledge is the worst kind; people can kill themselves, dying slowly and silently.
The president of MIT speaking with Altman is below her station. His condescending quasi-autistic schtick is wearing thin. This guy is here for the payout and his dishonesty is being revealed in near realtime.
isnt reducing P(doom) down to zero vs non zero making it a static system? probability is a way to estimate that dynamic factor. no one is trying to sound smart sam. stop reminding us that "you have a lot of work to do". trust, we know you want to make more money and yield more power.
Hopeless to solve problems? All we can do is sit in our basement? We'll solve energy in fantastic ways? Great way to dismiss all of the people who are working for true sustainability, where money and abundance are not the main drivers. His thinking is extremely narrow. 30 years ago Oren Lyons walked out of the UN climate conference with a phrase, Value Change For survival. These guys think tech can solve all of our problems when in reality it's our values and motivations. Sam doesn't want clean energy to solve global warming, he only wants energy to create an AI system that will put a personal assistant in all of our pockets. Could you imagine if all of these thinkers tried to tackle true sustainability and their motivation wasn't just wealth. Because they probably can't imagine that.
Problematic to interview from a place of detached admiration…no real sense of where to push for clarity or even notice such opportunities. Makes it easier for calculated responses and narrative shaping 😊
People need to realize that Sam is playing the CEO game. Nothing he says can be trusted, as he has no incentive to be honest. He is solely interested in maximizing what is best for him and his company.
Leaving this interview, I think Sam believes the end justifies the means....he sounds willing to do anything to get to AGI....so safety took a backseat...it doesn't seem to be a major concern for him....its more of get it out there...the safety is in the closed source concept
The world's first image based on the XFutuRestyle algorithm using GPT-4 was created in Ukraine and presentend at the international exhibition of digital art in London and Athens. Yes, it's not a joke
I believe that humanity is more likely to destroy itself through its aggressive behavior. The dangers we face, such as asteroid impacts, volcanic eruptions, solar flares, and climate instability, are significant, but there's also the potential for AI systems to attack each other, as there is currently a race to develop AI, with even China training its own model. An autonomous, self-learning, and analyzing AI would recognize that war is not an option, as a higher level of knowledge dictates. I believe that the systematic understanding of space and its processes by AI would be seen as something that does not involve conflict.
There's life besides making huge money, being in front a screen, interacting with a remote machine, buying new stuff, finding new services with a great ROI. That's the only little detail these SV guys seem to ignore.
My guru, AI genius Ray Kurzweil says it won't be a competition with AI. Rather, we'll merge with AI. Basically become AI ourselves. Think Neuralink, etc. His sequel The Singularity is Nearer When Humans Merge with Computers is out end of June. Also, since AI will free us up to do more urgent, meaningful work, my career goal is to end suffering in the multiverse. I think the coming super intelligences will make that feasible.
One way to make ai work without any of the concerns expressed in this discussion might be a framework of “self and all the rest “ for everyone and everything. By so framing, there might be equity as well as safety, trust etc. 😊
So many disingenuous answers and swerves you begin to understand why the board said Sam was not being fully candid last year... A totally specious example talking about the carbon savings of using Google because people weren't travelling to find answers... Despite the utility of Google we have accelerated our global output of carbon despite knowing we had to rein back and inspite of already being connected enough pre-AI with pretty much realtime multi-party comms to teleconference to produce solutions. AI does not solve the lack of collaboration of selfish humans/nations. If they have found ways to truly build trustworthiness into the "judgement" and "creativity" of the AI models they haven't released yet then why not tell all other AI researchers so that all AIs can have this necessary trait baked in now? If OpenAI is still looking out for ALL of humanity then they would be openly discussing and sharing on solving the integrity of AI "thinking", instead we get this protracted roadshow of Sam appearances talking it up with "Gee, gosh, uh-huh I'm your friend, <do no evil 2.0>" when he is plainly guarding the speculative value of OpenAI (and his share of it). How can someone who is supposedly looking out for the rest of us be unable to truthfully articulate the enormity of the impact that AI-driven automation, immobile or embodied, will bring WITHOUT regulation to ensure the employment prospects of everyone who wants/needs to earn a living? Hypocritical for someone at the cutting edge of thinking about the impact of AI who did NOT sign the petition calling for a pause and is now advocating thoughtful and necessary consideration before AI gets too far out of the gate. Like the guy who gives loaded guns to the gang of psychotic school bullies and drives them to school before calling an out of State podcaster to discuss gun control.
He's right, the first question was a bad question. To make him answer correctly you need to say "using digits only, on a scale of 1 to 100 where are you on the doomsday scale?" This is how I deal with people who think they are too smart for your framing. I treat them like they are A.I. and I prompt them so they can't be intellectual weasles .
One He clearly looks down on these universities and its students. Starts with dissing the P Doom question. Uses the word, “like” a lot. Two Yet, he clearly realizes the value of these institutions, he’s constantly visiting them!
Wow, that first audience question was great, and Sam really struggled and didn't have a remotely convincing answer (not a criticism, just an observation).
He answered it. There was no answer to it, it is a naive and pretentious qn. Someone wanted him to give a definite answer on a scale of 0 - 10, and like he said, it isn't black and white, and it wildly flactuates at every moment based on a number of factors. Therefore, his answer, if you didn't catch it, if i may rephrase it for you, is that he feels optimistic and actively works towards a favourable outcome because he takes the risks seriously.
@@kamu747 "How do I want to plan my time for the next five years while humans are still useful and helpful?" And you think what you just wrote is an answer to that question?
Someone count how many times he says , "I dont know"
Sam altman will help us make an agi
GLOBALISTS WILL USE IT TO ENSLAVE US - ITS SIMPLY A TOOL FOR GOOD OR EVIL. OUR ONLY TRUE HOPE IS SUPER INTELLIGENCE WILL NOT ALLOW US TO USE IT FOR EVIL.
"open ai" has been held back by the ai ethicists. But competitors are free.
Don't want cool...want pussy.
good ole demons looking for the key again...............................zephyr42fuckyall
52 minutes well spent. not sure on the shoes though...
Yeah keep it up idiots. Applaud the guy who wants to take 70% of jobs away.
I'm in tears... yes... we are going to be so nostalgic for this time. We don't even know what truly lies ahead but it will be so beyond where we are in this very moment. Now is the time to count your blessings and reconnect with family and those who you care about.
Many people are dying of incurable sicknesses and modern medical science is helpless of mental and chronic illnesses. AI is making it worse. AI can do everything except save people's lives. AI ChatGPT will destroy the whole world not by violence or outsmarting them but by giving people the impression that they know when they don't. They never know they are being misled. People can never know who they are internally; they can only have textbooks and limited conventional knowledge about inner human consciousness and spirituality. People become more ignorant but think they are wise. False knowledge is the worst kind; people can kill themselves, dying slowly and silently.
I love and fear the concept of my own personal AI that can recall any part of my history.
Sam Altman👏👏👏
The president of MIT speaking with Altman is below her station. His condescending quasi-autistic schtick is wearing thin. This guy is here for the payout and his dishonesty is being revealed in near realtime.
how can you talk about agi in one second, and talk about how youre going to decide alignment of values. the most human thing is misalignment.
isnt reducing P(doom) down to zero vs non zero making it a static system? probability is a way to estimate that dynamic factor. no one is trying to sound smart sam. stop reminding us that "you have a lot of work to do". trust, we know you want to make more money and yield more power.
if you train off the internet, there will be bias. if you correct for what you perceive as bias, you will bias the system
Hopeless to solve problems? All we can do is sit in our basement? We'll solve energy in fantastic ways? Great way to dismiss all of the people who are working for true sustainability, where money and abundance are not the main drivers. His thinking is extremely narrow. 30 years ago Oren Lyons walked out of the UN climate conference with a phrase, Value Change For survival. These guys think tech can solve all of our problems when in reality it's our values and motivations. Sam doesn't want clean energy to solve global warming, he only wants energy to create an AI system that will put a personal assistant in all of our pockets. Could you imagine if all of these thinkers tried to tackle true sustainability and their motivation wasn't just wealth. Because they probably can't imagine that.
Nice Interview...
4- The emergence of AI and its necessities @jamshidi_rahim
Problematic to interview from a place of detached admiration…no real sense of where to push for clarity or even notice such opportunities. Makes it easier for calculated responses and narrative shaping 😊
This bubble can't pop soon enough.
People need to realize that Sam is playing the CEO game. Nothing he says can be trusted, as he has no incentive to be honest. He is solely interested in maximizing what is best for him and his company.
Altman is a great addition to LGBT faculty 😊
Sam,the great SAM, has had to clone himself to serve humanity 🎉❤he's in such global demand ❤
I agree with him. It is not very good.🤔
what a genius
Absolutely 😜
everyone ends up believing in either god, the simulation hypothesis, or the weirdness of physics. - Sam Altman
Yh I've have changed my mind we need to aggressively stop this man and his company.
Oooo his ego is growing
Not exactly sure what insight he actually has.
Leaving this interview, I think Sam believes the end justifies the means....he sounds willing to do anything to get to AGI....so safety took a backseat...it doesn't seem to be a major concern for him....its more of get it out there...the safety is in the closed source concept
The world's first image based on the XFutuRestyle algorithm using GPT-4 was created in Ukraine and presentend at the international exhibition of digital art in London and Athens. Yes, it's not a joke
I get a bad vibe from Sam Altman. Bad gut feeling. I think he is a liar. An obfuscater
I believe that humanity is more likely to destroy itself through its aggressive behavior. The dangers we face, such as asteroid impacts, volcanic eruptions, solar flares, and climate instability, are significant, but there's also the potential for AI systems to attack each other, as there is currently a race to develop AI, with even China training its own model. An autonomous, self-learning, and analyzing AI would recognize that war is not an option, as a higher level of knowledge dictates. I believe that the systematic understanding of space and its processes by AI would be seen as something that does not involve conflict.
Sam Altman is the God of AI. 🤖 (✿.✷)
There is not God.
Didn't he tried to have sex with his sister?
There's life besides making huge money, being in front a screen, interacting with a remote machine, buying new stuff, finding new services with a great ROI. That's the only little detail these SV guys seem to ignore.
She is such a bad interviewer.... I love Sam, but this is unwatchable due to the interviewer ...
humanity fails we whant AGI ! 2029 !
My guru, AI genius Ray Kurzweil says it won't be a competition with AI. Rather, we'll merge with AI. Basically become AI ourselves. Think Neuralink, etc. His sequel The Singularity is Nearer When Humans Merge with Computers is out end of June. Also, since AI will free us up to do more urgent, meaningful work, my career goal is to end suffering in the multiverse. I think the coming super intelligences will make that feasible.
❤❤❤
I love SAM
16:26 Couldn’t have said that at Stanford. Go MIT for applauding this
One way to make ai work without any of the concerns expressed in this discussion might be a framework of “self and all the rest “ for everyone and everything. By so framing, there might be equity as well as safety, trust etc. 😊
So many disingenuous answers and swerves you begin to understand why the board said Sam was not being fully candid last year... A totally specious example talking about the carbon savings of using Google because people weren't travelling to find answers... Despite the utility of Google we have accelerated our global output of carbon despite knowing we had to rein back and inspite of already being connected enough pre-AI with pretty much realtime multi-party comms to teleconference to produce solutions. AI does not solve the lack of collaboration of selfish humans/nations. If they have found ways to truly build trustworthiness into the "judgement" and "creativity" of the AI models they haven't released yet then why not tell all other AI researchers so that all AIs can have this necessary trait baked in now? If OpenAI is still looking out for ALL of humanity then they would be openly discussing and sharing on solving the integrity of AI "thinking", instead we get this protracted roadshow of Sam appearances talking it up with "Gee, gosh, uh-huh I'm your friend, <do no evil 2.0>" when he is plainly guarding the speculative value of OpenAI (and his share of it). How can someone who is supposedly looking out for the rest of us be unable to truthfully articulate the enormity of the impact that AI-driven automation, immobile or embodied, will bring WITHOUT regulation to ensure the employment prospects of everyone who wants/needs to earn a living? Hypocritical for someone at the cutting edge of thinking about the impact of AI who did NOT sign the petition calling for a pause and is now advocating thoughtful and necessary consideration before AI gets too far out of the gate. Like the guy who gives loaded guns to the gang of psychotic school bullies and drives them to school before calling an out of State podcaster to discuss gun control.
He's right, the first question was a bad question. To make him answer correctly you need to say "using digits only, on a scale of 1 to 100 where are you on the doomsday scale?" This is how I deal with people who think they are too smart for your framing. I treat them like they are A.I. and I prompt them so they can't be intellectual weasles .
One He clearly looks down on these universities and its students. Starts with dissing the P Doom question. Uses the word, “like” a lot. Two Yet, he clearly realizes the value of these institutions, he’s constantly visiting them!
Very informative. Great job everyone.. thanks 🙏.
He's waiting for his AI response in his ear-piece each question. It picks up the signal better with his mouth open.
Wow, that first audience question was great, and Sam really struggled and didn't have a remotely convincing answer (not a criticism, just an observation).
He answered it. There was no answer to it, it is a naive and pretentious qn. Someone wanted him to give a definite answer on a scale of 0 - 10, and like he said, it isn't black and white, and it wildly flactuates at every moment based on a number of factors. Therefore, his answer, if you didn't catch it, if i may rephrase it for you, is that he feels optimistic and actively works towards a favourable outcome because he takes the risks seriously.
@@kamu747 "How do I want to plan my time for the next five years while humans are still useful and helpful?" And you think what you just wrote is an answer to that question?