วีดีโอ

???? Umm Did you even watch the video at all? We’re literally talking about Creature Commandos, not Superman

@@thegotspod yeah I did but it helps when you provide context on what you’re talking about so people don’t get confused 🤔

@@Ryethefryguywe literally said that the cops are trying to capture Weasel in this clip which is a very specific scene in the Creature Commandos show. I think it’s pretty clear what show we’re talking about

@ you think everyone is a big enough nerds to watch “creature commando” never even heard of it

@ hmmm yeah a podcast about comic books and comic book movies covering a show about comic book characters is pretty weird huh?

Ahh man if you didn’t like Suicide Squad, this will be a tough watch for you. I’m in the same boat, definitely agree with you

Haha I mean I really enjoyed Guardians 1, I think 3 had some good parts too, but yeah, overall a bit repetitive

Thank you! I feel like we just complained but I appreciate it! Haha

@@thegotspod nah it was great

😂😂😂 he literally changed it up because of our time on your show lol

@@thegotspod for the better i hope lol love you guys!

@@jeremiahhall4083 those are some good aspects to appreciate all things considered.

Velma-vibes?! Zoinks! I agree tho. I think the voice acting overall was great. I liked some of the backstories too. Kinda comes off as a way to just tell the, “sad stories” of these sad creatures. If we get another season will they do that all over again 😂. Or will they let a monster be a monster? They played at it with Dr. Phosphorus but wouldn’t commit. It would actually be refreshing to see evil just be evil.

@ personally we got that with the princess

@@ButterstarD1true! Good call

Well said!

Thanks for your opinion Butterstar. The show was okay to me, but I’m glad to see someone defend it. I know there are people that enjoyed it. One of my issues connects with something you said. But (IMO) in a nutshell: why make this? We got 2 suicide squads and the peacemaker series. And they are the same thing. I don’t hate creature commandos and it’s an easy watch, but that’s all it is, again imo. I’m glad it made people happy tho.

Follow up: do you want a 2nd season? I’d be curious to see them incorporate more of the various monsters to pull from. I’d probably watch again if like, Dracula or wolf man got added.

@ I get what you mean man. All of it can feel so repetitive and not in need for more, and you’re valid for thinking that because it’s true and is a real issue. On the bright side, with the latest Superman project on its way we could see more branching out on gunns side. Another side note: one of the reasons why it can feel repetitive is because all the shows/movies are based on the comics.

@ yeah that would be really fun. They actually have already confirmed a season 2 and has announced new teammates like a mummy and a bat lady (literally)

Right on! Good to know another season got picked up! I’m really hoping the Superman movie is a win: for Gunn, for the fans and for comic book movies in general!

It's a classic!

@@Yatlord it was actually surprisingly good man! One of the better eggnogs I’ve had

We will thank you! We’re trying to follow your lead!!

It just comes off as a bit forced. If you watched a movie about a small Japanese mountain town in the feudal era and there are a bunch of different ethnicities playing different characters, it kind of doesn’t make sense because it doesn’t fit the setting. If you make a movie about the German army during World War II and make a black person one of the officers, it doesn’t make sense because that’s not how it was then. Most black people in America during the colonial times were slaves, they wouldn’t be running a business in a small colonial town. I’m all for diversity and inclusion but when it’s forced to the point where it doesn’t fit the setting, it’s incredibly glaring.

😂😂😂 we had to include you in the skit somehow lol

haha thanks man! That was all Badical putting the edit in there! Thanks for watching as always!

@@kvng_t1de13 we have one negative in a two hour episode and that’s us complaining about everything? Got it. Did you even watch to the end of this clip where we rate the season pretty high? I guess We’ll just make sure every thing we say in the next episodes is all positives and pretend there aren’t any negatives. 👍

The show could have used more hookers and flapjacks...just sayin

@@thegotspod awww did I hurt y’all feelings y’all want pacifiers maybe a bottle of milk get y’all lame asses on dawg😂

Season 6 showed that most of the heros/teachers either quit or are dead cause of the league of villains and most of them get put in the hospital as well

Couldn’t agree with you more. Aren’t there so many other schools and agencies? And yeah, The Todoroki family stuff was the most engaging part of this season, hands down. Yeah we get the short mention of how the power affected other users that already had quirks but that’s the only thing I remember learning about the past experience of the other one for all users. Yeah those are for sure the best arcs. You said it my friend

Everything happening right now would make more sense to me if they gave U-A students a timeskip, or if the show began with a theme of having an exclusive hero University for Japan. That would make class 1-A decently relevant for me. I would still say that My hero Vigilantes is worth trying, but the finally isn't much better

@@Boba_Fettuccine. There was military both at tartarus, and that aided Stars and Stripes. They were completely inaffective, even with future tech. Reality is that the military does not have the firepower to do anything.

@@rainofkhandaq6678 The authorities should have access to quirk eraser serum, and the key issue is that most of these villains are people who were already defeated by All Might. They could all just be endless jailbreakers if something serious isn't done. I'm also assuming some military or emergency workers would contribute with their quirks as well. Also why haven't they been protecting heteromorphs ? (I haven't read the main story)

So Toga deciding to change into Ochaco and giver her blood to keep her alive while sacrificing herself isn’t an attempted redemption from all the trouble she’s caused?

​@@thegotspod No. Redemption requires atonement. This is simply showing the full range of actions caused by her mental issues. If you pay attention to her writing throughout the show they're the source of her every action, she literally can't help it. At this point she's obsessed with Uraraka and Deku to the point of doing what she did. You can call it a "redemption attempt" if you want to, but in reality this is consistent writing. Now, whether it's meant to aid in making people feel sorry for her, or not, is a different topic.

Okay, 11 things!

😂😂😂 all that climbing and adventuring leads to John Cena Build I think haha I think some of the game references were cool, but outside of that, yeah I don’t know

Crazy how that concept translates to a lot of different areas huh? Haha great observation!

That’s insane! On the one hand you think “cool, no studio interference! Creative freedom!” But then you see it and you’re like “maybe they should’ve interfered” lol

I've just come out of the screening. And frankly, I loved the film. As I expected, I was right to make up my own mind and not listen to the critics. So clearly, if someone asks me if I liked the first film, I'm going to say ‘YES, it's great’. Whereas with the second, I'd say ‘It's a good film, BUT...’. I think that to appreciate the film you have to see it as a continuation of the first, on the character of Arthur. We're not going to see the Joker, but Arthur's story. You have to see it as a psychological film and let yourself be immersed in the atmosphere, in Joaquin Phoenix's superb acting, in the artistic side of the film. And not everyone is so sensitive to that. The film is different from a Joker film, but even more different from the first Joker film. And I think that's why most people were disappointed by the film... You have to admit that it's the main actor who carries the film, and just seeing him on screen again was brilliant, letting yourself be carried away by the character, the very special atmosphere of the first film that we find here, some very beautiful scenes that we find again in this sequel, very well realised I think. And the famous staircase scene, this time he climbs the stairs towards his beloved, with the same gait as at the beginning of the first film, he's slumped over, everything stops, he lets himself be carried away, and it's here that he leaves his role as the Joker. The ending is poignant and leaves the torch to the ‘Real’ Joker. The message at the end is pretty good, it's well written, Arthur accepts his fate, he finally accepts who he is. And that's how he dies. Because nobody accepts him for who he really is. It's quite sad really. But no, I can't say that the film is BAD and I don't understand these disastrous scores. At least the film tries something original, it's hit or miss, but it's got the merit of having carried me along and I came out of the film ‘stunned’. All in all, I loved these two Joker films with Joaquin Phoenix and they left a lasting impression on me. This was the Joker's best performance. His laugh, his facial expressions, his charisma, his outfit too ! A real class act. To like the film you need to have a certain distance and a certain sensitivity, and alas, I can see from the ratings that the majority don't have that. So, sadly, we're going to be stuck in the future with good, big action films without trying to innovate. In the end, in the first film, Arthur starts at the bottom and works his way up. Whereas in the second film he's at the very top, and falls back to the very bottom. He's not the Joker, but he inspired the MOVEMENT for future Jokers, and at the end we see the real ‘Joker’ cutting his cheeks. THE END.

I can give him that, that is a bold move for sure financially and professionally, but I think I just have the issue with them answering the question “what happens next?” After that first film. The ambiguous ending of the first one was much better but now that we have the answer, it almost cheapens the first film.

it could have went the easy way and made him joker - but I don't he realized the society is right - fleck got taken out of context and started to represent the real world - example had an employee and wasn't having a good day and he told me - I feel like joker ! and when anyone says that it's not a good thing - and Phillips must have noticed that also -

@@MarcAubin-jo1bh yeah that’s a good point and I understand where he’s coming from if that was the intention, but from a story and character progression perspective, it just didn’t hit

Exactly!! It’s a different show in a lot of ways

The heroes Gotham deserve! 😂 I’m glad we could save you the trouble, definitely a tough one to get through haha

It's important to make up your own mind. Each to his own opinion and critical spirit. At least the film tries to innovate and change codes. That's good for cinema. The film isn't bad. You just have to understand it. As far as the musical is concerned, it's a logical and very coherent follow-up to The Joker. Already in the first film, dance and song are the character's therapy. So it's no problem to have a sequel based on dance and song, Arthur's way of escaping from this prison. It's very well written.

@@EliasH-o8j that’s fair and yeah, to each his own. But to see the character devolve back to where he was at the start of the first film and start over again at the beginning of the second film to not even build himself back up to where he was isn’t good character progression, in my opinion. I don’t think we had an issue with understanding the film, the execution, for us, just wasn’t there regardless of it being a musical or not. And since we, personally, don’t like how they answered “what happened to Arthur fleck after the first film” it was much better when we didn’t know. The ambiguous open-ended way the first film ended was much more impactful.

​@@thegotspodWell said!!!

Thank you so much! Putting It together was a labor of love of definitely worth it!

Dude couldn’t agree with you more!!

What you said exactly!!!

Dude! I’m glad we aren’t the only ones either! Seriously went from night to day in a matter of moments

@@nixus1909 that’s cool man. We just thought that that D transitioning into Megatron was almost immediate. They could’ve spread that out over the planned trilogy they have. Now we’re just going to get two more movies in this series of the decepticons and autobits fighting each other. Would’ve been cooler to see that stretched out over the trilogy. But if you were good with it, that’s cool too

Him going from a basic digger to the leader of a military group (& accepted as such) in a couple of days wasn’t rushed? I’m going to assume you have a best friend. Under what circumstances would you kill them? What would have to happen within 48-72 hours, for you to intentionally murder them? Or u get an amazing opportunity, that you never would have gotten, thanks to this friend, but you have to work together. (Which you’ve already been doing.) You wouldn’t even try? Those are the questions they posed. - It went from zero to crazy way too fast.

@@marcpope7069 Brother. He realized the life he had been living was entirely a lie, that’s a huge revelation for him, how can you motivate comprehend that? Sentinel took everything from him.

Thank you…? Not sure who that is but I’m sure he’s great if you’re putting him in the same category as me haah

@@peperry8349 aww got it, didn’t see the dub so that would make sense, but it still makes you think about how different the dub and the sub is

@thegotspod it definitely was abit jarring/unimmersive at points, hopefully someone does a better fan sub at some point, great series over all though.

I think the script was originally written in English so its technically the original dialogue but dont quote me on that i could be wrong.

The movie wasn’t entertaining to me, does it still make it a good movie? If someone asked you for a recommendation for a movie with a good storyline, would you recommend the Goonies? No one watches the Goonies and says “what a great engaging storyline with well-developed characters” people say “what a fun movie with a kid that shakes his belly and a deformed man yelling ‘Hey you guys!” I’m seeing this movie from the lens of an adult who likes movies with a good storyline. The Goonies does not fit that category. What’s the one type of film I can watch then?

@@trenttucker5847 Yes. It can still be a good movie, just not to you. Would I recommend Goonies as a good storyline? Depends who I’m talking to and what we’re talking about. But kids finding an actual treasure map is just as good or better than teenagers trying to get booze for a party. That’s the storyline for Superbad. That’s a bad movie? Of course not. That film was full of cartoon characters and a lot more dick jokes, but still great. I wouldn’t recommend Goonies on your criteria simply because there are better movies to suggest. People say what a fun movie it is for those reasons not entirely because of those reasons. It’s also, those boys and their friendship, it’s the 2 brothers who are different in almost every way, but clearly love each other, and it’s going on an adventure that almost every child on earth has imagined: finding a map that leads to adventure & riches. Also, there’s nothing wrong with a catch phrase. A good movie can make a catch phrase. A catch phrase can’t make a movie good. Ultimately, if you can’t enjoy Goonies anymore, there’s nothing wrong with that. I take some umbrage if you’re saying that makes the film bad. 😄 And what kind of movie can you watch? That’s the million dollar question. But it seems like those lanes keep disappearing brother! The good thing is I know your reasons are thought out. So they should be taken seriously