VitalMetrics
VitalMetrics
  • 22
  • 150 073

วีดีโอ

Closing Plenary 2021 Industrial Ecology Day
มุมมอง 693 ปีที่แล้ว
Listen to the conversation between industrial ecology and marginal emissions factor researchers. Moderated by Sangwon Suh. The following topics will be broadly introduced and discussed by the panelists: - How has the marginal emissions factor literature in electric utility sector evolved? - What are the recent developments in marginal emissions factor approaches? - How are the discussions in th...
Webinar: CDP reporting and beyond 2021
มุมมอง 1.2K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Our President, Sangwon Suh, shares common mistakes and insightful tips to maximizing your CDP score in 2021. Shortcuts: Intro: (0:00) Mistake & Tip 1: (13:27) Mistake & Tip 2: (18:20) Mistake & Tip 3: (21:32) Q&A: (33:06) For more information, visit: www.vitalmetricsgroup.com/​ Follow us on LinkedIn for the latest industry news: www.linkedin.com/company/vitalmetrics-group/?viewAsMember=true
How VitalMetrics can help your business | Windstream case study
มุมมอง 5333 ปีที่แล้ว
Learn how VitalMetrics's consultation and carbon reporting software, Carbon360, helped Windstream achieve a higher score when disclosing to CDP in 2020. For more information and to book a demo, visit: www.vitalmetricsgroup.com/ Follow us on LinkedIn for the latest industry news: www.linkedin.com/company/vitalmetrics-group/ Music by Wavecont, www.wavecont.com/free-download Video Link: th-cam.com...
VitalMetrics Carbon360 Demo
มุมมอง 1.2K4 ปีที่แล้ว
The VitalMetrics Carbon360 cloud-based platform makes it easy to calculate your scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, filling in any gaps with proprietary data when you get stuck. Get a free trial and consult today. Contact info@vitalmetricsgroup.com to learn more!
VitalMetrics Carbon360
มุมมอง 8274 ปีที่แล้ว
VitalMetrics Carbon360 is designed to fulfill all your organization’s carbon accounting and reporting needs in one secure, web-based platform. It covers Scope 1, 2, and 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and allows you to input data for multiple facilities and countries.
CDP Webinar: Envisioning Climate Change Related Financial Risks Using Scenario Planning
มุมมอง 4925 ปีที่แล้ว
VitalMetrics and CDP co-hosted a webinar discussing how scenario analysis can be used to evaluate the risks and opportunities climate change presents to organizations. Additionally, the CDP team reviewed the alignment of its climate change questionnaire with TCFD's recommendations. For more information, please contact us at www.vitalmetricsgroup.com/locations
Get to know VitalMetrics Group!
มุมมอง 9525 ปีที่แล้ว
VitalMetrics enables corporations, government agencies, and nonprofit organizations to achieve scientifically credible and commercially viable sustainability measurements. To learn more, visit: www.vitalmetricsgroup.com/
CDP Webinar: Scope 3, Procurement, and Engaging Suppliers
มุมมอง 1K6 ปีที่แล้ว
A CDP-hosted webinar discussing strategies to quantify greenhouse gas emissions from procurement and use them as a conduit for engaging your suppliers and collecting primary data. For more information, please contact us at www.vitalmetricsgroup.com/locations/
CDP Webinar: VitalMetrics' Scope 3 Calculation Tool
มุมมอง 2.1K6 ปีที่แล้ว
A CDP-hosted webinar introducing the VitalMetrics Scope 3 Calculation Tool. For more information, contact us at www.vitalmetrics-cdp.com/contact/
CDP Webinar: How to Optimize Your CDP Disclosure
มุมมอง 1.3K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Did you know that your organization's CDP score does not only depend on what you report, but also how you report it? The quality of responses can make a big impact on your overall CDP score, and could make all the difference when aspiring for that coveted leadership status! Join VitalMetrics in our second webinar of this CDP season to learn about important strategies your organization can use t...
CDP Scope 3 Webinar: Using Financial Data to Measure Scope 3 GHG Emissions
มุมมอง 7K7 ปีที่แล้ว
Supply chain emissions can be the largest source of an organization’s climate impacts - about four times their direct emissions on average! Accurate and efficient Scope 3 measurement is imperative to maximizing CDP scoring and improving your company’s economic, environmental, and social performance, but supply chain emissions can be the most difficult to quantify. Fortunately, VitalMetrics has ...
CDP Part 1: CDP Overview
มุมมอง 13K7 ปีที่แล้ว
For more information, contact us at info@vitalmetrics-cdp.com
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Part 3: Scope 3 Categories Explained
มุมมอง 46K7 ปีที่แล้ว
For more information, contact us at info@vitalmetrics-cdp.com
CDP Part 3: Global Warming Potential Explained
มุมมอง 17K8 ปีที่แล้ว
For more information, contact us at info@vitalmetrics-cdp.com.
VitalMetrics-CDP Scope 3 Tool Demo
มุมมอง 6578 ปีที่แล้ว
VitalMetrics-CDP Scope 3 Tool Demo
How VitalMetrics Can Help with Your GHG Accounting Needs
มุมมอง 5648 ปีที่แล้ว
How VitalMetrics Can Help with Your GHG Accounting Needs
CDP Part 4: Breakdown of the Differences Between CDP's 2015 & 2016 Methodologies
มุมมอง 1.7K8 ปีที่แล้ว
CDP Part 4: Breakdown of the Differences Between CDP's 2015 & 2016 Methodologies
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Part 1: Standardizing Emissions Reporting
มุมมอง 20K8 ปีที่แล้ว
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Part 1: Standardizing Emissions Reporting
CDP Part 2: Performance versus Disclosure Score
มุมมอง 3.6K8 ปีที่แล้ว
CDP Part 2: Performance versus Disclosure Score
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Part 2: Scopes 1, 2, and 3 Explained
มุมมอง 30K8 ปีที่แล้ว
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Part 2: Scopes 1, 2, and 3 Explained
Travis Perkins: Sustainable Spend Analysis - Supply Chain Sustainability Analysis CASE STUDY
มุมมอง 1338 ปีที่แล้ว
Travis Perkins: Sustainable Spend Analysis - Supply Chain Sustainability Analysis CASE STUDY

ความคิดเห็น

  • @JonathanGreen-i9h
    @JonathanGreen-i9h หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dach Freeway

  • @AmyWilson-r5t
    @AmyWilson-r5t 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lavada Parks

  • @PauletteRogers-u4q
    @PauletteRogers-u4q 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Providenci Shoal

  • @YaleArlen-x3i
    @YaleArlen-x3i 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gracie Cliff

  • @KeppelAdelaide-s4c
    @KeppelAdelaide-s4c 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imogene Roads

  • @CleliaBuchan-m6m
    @CleliaBuchan-m6m 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brakus Drive

  • @BellamyBruce-s6p
    @BellamyBruce-s6p 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Harber Track

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. There is no mechanism that would allow greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. The back of the United Nation's IPCC science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

  • @kulikovson
    @kulikovson 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @bondo6506
    @bondo6506 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pure Propaganda,.....

  • @kimlibera663
    @kimlibera663 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As someone with a masters in earth science I will enlighten the crowd about the false info here. First the opening picture shows smoke coming out of nuclear water towers. This is not CO2; it is water vapor. CO2 is invisible & odorless. She neglects to include water vapor which is the most potent ghg by volume & by potency. The range of water vapor is 1-4% on the planet; it has a quicker residence time. CO2 is a distant #2. Vapor exceeds water vapor in power by 97X. It has a longer residence. She also does not tell the audience that the planet has sinks. Only those in meteorology would know this. The sinks are all oceans & seas; all vegetation from plankton to redwoods; & the sediments (limestones). Heat increases lead CO2, not the other way around. This is what I mean by the cultists really neglecting the science. What greenhouse gases do is interact with very specific photons of IR light (thermal portion of sunlight). If a specific photon fits into the molecule, it absorbs it & immediately emits it. The photon can now either bump into another molecule or exit to space. In this respect water vapor has many more windows open to different photons. Furthermore, just as water vapor saturates the air & as you know-it releases the latent heat of condensation via rain, clouds, fog, etc, then CO2 also has a saturation point. Most of the work done by CO2 is accomplished in the first 150 ppm or so. After that the temp incline stabilizes. What it means is under a hypothetical doubling, the IR reradiating off the ground cannot penetrate a denser layer of CO2 to heat the air above. The height is confined to 1/2 each time.

  • @sauravdhami47
    @sauravdhami47 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    beautifully explained.

  • @sonampayl.den_777
    @sonampayl.den_777 ปีที่แล้ว

    helped me a lot.

  • @sonampayl.den_777
    @sonampayl.den_777 ปีที่แล้ว

    perfect.

  • @paulsnow
    @paulsnow ปีที่แล้ว

    Methane absorbs at 3.3, 7.7, and 12.2 um. Blackbody radiation of the earth is 9.6 to 15 um. Water absorbs radiation at 2 to 15 um, meaning methane absorbs only one useful band which it shares with (massively abundant) water. The "methane is a worse green house gas" is a lie; the impact of methane today is only high because there is so little of it.

  • @paulsnow
    @paulsnow ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow. What about water?

  • @jeffrey1902
    @jeffrey1902 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍 ρяσмσѕм

  • @mladenski
    @mladenski 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish you all the best

  • @kids_tution4890
    @kids_tution4890 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Summer

  • @mohamedboullouz4082
    @mohamedboullouz4082 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you it is very helpful

  • @richardadamwais9734
    @richardadamwais9734 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thsnk you but what about bushfire and eruption volcano which scope do they are

    • @FG-vf7pq
      @FG-vf7pq 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Disaster! That scope problem is the result of Planet Earth operating procedures (random) - managing your emissions would make it easier to create a buffer in the Earths carbon sink. Stop wasting your remaining usage points!

    • @lalaalala1
      @lalaalala1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      These are not related to corporate activities, so not applicable

  • @ihatetheantichrist5336
    @ihatetheantichrist5336 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Carbon is good for plant life. We're not doing this any more, sorry.

    • @cgijoe1046
      @cgijoe1046 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kek

    • @FG-vf7pq
      @FG-vf7pq 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes but its not good human and animal life - who are equally important - don't you think? If you are breathing you are still doing IT - sorry you cant leave so long as you breathe!

    • @ihatetheantichrist5336
      @ihatetheantichrist5336 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FG-vf7pq carbon is good for the planet and we aren't listening to you any more.

    • @Leowe98
      @Leowe98 ปีที่แล้ว

      Too much Carbon inevitably leads to global warming. Many trees and plants are dying because it is too dry - because of climate change. Plant life is completely over-fertilized by carbon, which can lead to a shortened life span and susceptibility to disease. Please do not treat such statements so lightly.

  • @saravanakumarm2382
    @saravanakumarm2382 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is helpful..., do more videos on climate. 👌🏼

  • @heikehundertmark4449
    @heikehundertmark4449 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for sharing this wonderful webinar 🤩🤩🤩

  • @ytsm
    @ytsm 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    *Put* *that* *cookie* *DOWN!!!!* 🍪

  • @ardaisldar6758
    @ardaisldar6758 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the 7th category of GHG? Did I miss it?

  • @bkumar7394
    @bkumar7394 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear, Ma'am /sir team we are (geography students of A. M college) from India please give a opportunities some things to do please🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏(brindabankumar5@gmail.com) Thank you

  • @samlair3342
    @samlair3342 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Given that half of the American population is not capable of reading a book written at the 8th grade level and that one-in-five cannot independently fill out a job application form, it’s understandable why public comprehension of the greenhouse effect (taught in junior high) is limited. Though classroom demonstrations can help overcome this difficulty, shortage of funds and overworked staff can make that difficult. And I’m not sure what would help older adults. Therefore, the use of teaching videos from TH-cam at home could be useful (though these are limited in some ways): samslair.blogspot.com/search?q=Greenhouse+Effect+videos+&m=1

  • @deniztav
    @deniztav 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @enjoyfood966
    @enjoyfood966 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the good discription

  • @alpinebe4ch597
    @alpinebe4ch597 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well hopefully CO2 will stay in the atmosphere forever, otherwise plants and subsequently all life on Earth will die out. Hopefully H2O, the biggest greenhouse gas, will also stay in the atmosphere. Blaming CO2 is like blaming H2O, a complete nonsense: plants love both

  • @alvalatka4075
    @alvalatka4075 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Um, please read up on this a little bit. You didn't even MENTION the largest greenhouse gas. H2O. Honestly, greenhouse gasses have very little to do with climate change. (It's mostly the sun, in case you were wondering.) But... if you must regurgitate what you've seen on CNN, please learn to read a teleprompter better. You really suck at it.

    • @cardellkenith
      @cardellkenith 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      H2O works differently to the other greenhouse gases as a sort of positive feedback loop. The way we increase H2O in atmopshere is by increasing the heat, which we do by increasing the other greenhous gases. We dont really directly output H2) so its included in the conversation, as it will decrease as a result of the other gases decreasing.

  • @WadcaWymiaru
    @WadcaWymiaru 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who paid this idiot to perform in this video? Greenhouse effect is a *MYTH* people!!!

  • @WadcaWymiaru
    @WadcaWymiaru 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dislike! Video is awfully WRONG! Greenhouse effect doesn't exist because all gases are that same...

    • @bugsbun406
      @bugsbun406 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you stop playing smart because your not 😏

    • @WadcaWymiaru
      @WadcaWymiaru 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bugsbun406 I LET YOU test my education as "climate scientist" : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_gas_law *Ideal Gas Law* : PV =nRT T = 101.3 / (8.314 x 1.225/28.97) = 288.14 K ~15°C Earth black body temperature is -18.8 °C degree or 254.3 K All of that 33 degree rise without greenhouse gas effect. Venus: T=9200/8.314 x 65/43.35 = 740K or ~470°C Titan: T=146.7/8.314 x 5.25/28 = 94.1K or -179°C Let's see evidence on other worlds: th-cam.com/video/BuTmHCRJovc/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/1Y_n283fYbc/w-d-xo.html sated?

    • @a2zsocialreaction704
      @a2zsocialreaction704 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WadcaWymiaru hi I want to know HFCs with GWP > 150 Means their environment life time is less than 150 years. Am I right? Please reply!

    • @WadcaWymiaru
      @WadcaWymiaru 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@a2zsocialreaction704 What? Use full words, english isn't my own! I do not understand the acronyms! Then i will answer.

    • @a2zsocialreaction704
      @a2zsocialreaction704 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WadcaWymiaru 🙄 I got it from somewhere else...☺️

  • @sudhirpandey2149
    @sudhirpandey2149 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    3xxx: UPSC:Environment.

  • @davidalejandrocc
    @davidalejandrocc 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you! really useful

  • @ivjyotoberoi1317
    @ivjyotoberoi1317 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just to clear the haze in understanding - we mean to say even though Carbon di-oxide due to its prevalence ( Volume ) attributes to a higher Green House Gas Effect at the moment, however for same volume of gas Methane ( having a higher GWP ) would account to a higher Green House Gas Effect?

    • @WadcaWymiaru
      @WadcaWymiaru 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That effect doesn't even exist...

    • @kimlibera663
      @kimlibera663 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      CO2 has a greater volume. In fact in some reactions CH4 converts to CO2. Some places measure CH4 in ppb v ppm. CH4 has a quicker reaction time. However, neither of these 2 gases are as powerful as water vapor. Read my above commentary. This podcast is junk science.