Clarity and Brevity
Clarity and Brevity
  • 141
  • 51 200

วีดีโอ

Who are the Double-Minded in James?
มุมมอง 892 วันที่ผ่านมา
In this video I discuss what James means by "double-minded" in James 1:8; 4:8.
The Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace, with Harrison Perkins
มุมมอง 12614 วันที่ผ่านมา
I'm joined by Harrison Perkins (PhD, Queen's University Belfast), pastor of Oakland Hills Community Church (OPC). We discuss the Covenant of Works in light of his recent book Reformed Covenant Theology, especially its relation to the Covenant of Grace. Resources: lexhampress.com/product/260139/reformed-covenant-theology-a-systematic-introduction
The Simple Gospel, with David Filson
มุมมอง 12321 วันที่ผ่านมา
I'm joined by Dr. David Filson, senior interim minister at Christ Presbyterian Church in Nashville and President's Professor of Apologetics at Westminster Theological Seminary. We discuss the simple gospel message in a complex culture. wm.wts.edu/faculty/david-owen-filson
The Divinity of Christ in the Second Century
มุมมอง 83หลายเดือนก่อน
When did the church view Jesus as divine? In this video I discuss the Christology of Ignatius of Antioch and some other second-century authors. For more detailed discussions of these issues, see chapter 6 of my book The Lord Jesus Christ. lexhampress.com/product/244694/the-lord-jesus-christ-the-biblical-doctrine-of-the-person-and-work-of-christ?queryId=93332f70be7f195eed64a0148c6a0c7f
Christ, Culture, and Critical Theory, with David Filson
มุมมอง 165หลายเดือนก่อน
I'm joined by Dr. David Filson, senior interim minister at Christ Presbyterian Church in Nashville and President's Professor of Apologetics at Westminster Theological Seminary. We discuss the relationship of the gospel to culture. wm.wts.edu/faculty/david-owen-filson
Objections to the Covenant of Works (Part 2), with Harrison Perkins
มุมมอง 61หลายเดือนก่อน
I'm joined by Harrison Perkins (PhD, Queen's University Belfast), pastor of Oakland Hills Community Church (OPC). We discuss the covenant of works in light of his recent book Reformed Covenant Theology, especially misconceptions and objections. Resources: lexhampress.com/product/260139/reformed-covenant-theology-a-systematic-introduction
Apologetics & the Image of God, with David Filson
มุมมอง 104หลายเดือนก่อน
I'm joined by Dr. David Filson, senior interim minister at Christ Presbyterian Church in Nashville and President's Professor of Apologetics at Westminster Theological Seminary. We discuss the nature of apologetics, and how it relates to the image of God (and the role of Romans 1 in apologetics). wm.wts.edu/faculty/david-owen-filson
Apologetics and the Bible, with David Filson
มุมมอง 146หลายเดือนก่อน
I'm joined by Dr. David Filson, senior interim minister at Christ Presbyterian Church in Nashville and President's Professor of Apologetics at Westminster Theological Seminary. We discuss the nature of apologetics, and how it relates to the Bible. wm.wts.edu/faculty/david-owen-filson
Objections to the Covenant of Works, with Harrison Perkins
มุมมอง 1622 หลายเดือนก่อน
Objections to the Covenant of Works, with Harrison Perkins
The Covenant of Works, with Harrison Perkins
มุมมอง 1762 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Covenant of Works, with Harrison Perkins
A Biblical-Theological Survey of Covenants
มุมมอง 1912 หลายเดือนก่อน
A Biblical-Theological Survey of Covenants
Two Types of Covenant Theology
มุมมอง 3013 หลายเดือนก่อน
Two Types of Covenant Theology
The Active & Passive Obedience of Christ
มุมมอง 1623 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Active & Passive Obedience of Christ
Justification and Perfect Obedience
มุมมอง 2023 หลายเดือนก่อน
Justification and Perfect Obedience
The Gospel in the Old Testament, with Vern Poythress
มุมมอง 2074 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Gospel in the Old Testament, with Vern Poythress
Sin and Imputation, with Jonny Gibson
มุมมอง 1004 หลายเดือนก่อน
Sin and Imputation, with Jonny Gibson
Why We Can Do Typology, with Vern Poythress
มุมมอง 5794 หลายเดือนก่อน
Why We Can Do Typology, with Vern Poythress
Sin in Paul's Letters, with Jonny Gibson
มุมมอง 2094 หลายเดือนก่อน
Sin in Paul's Letters, with Jonny Gibson
The Man of God, with John Currie
มุมมอง 1144 หลายเดือนก่อน
The Man of God, with John Currie
Biblical Typology, with Vern Poythress
มุมมอง 7155 หลายเดือนก่อน
Biblical Typology, with Vern Poythress
Ruined Sinners to Reclaim, with Jonny Gibson
มุมมอง 4035 หลายเดือนก่อน
Ruined Sinners to Reclaim, with Jonny Gibson
Preaching and Leadership, with John Currie
มุมมอง 1995 หลายเดือนก่อน
Preaching and Leadership, with John Currie
How to Interpret James
มุมมอง 1205 หลายเดือนก่อน
How to Interpret James
Christ as Surety & Mediator, with Robert Cara
มุมมอง 1516 หลายเดือนก่อน
Christ as Surety & Mediator, with Robert Cara
Petrus van Mastricht on "What is saving faith?" Discussion with Todd Rester
มุมมอง 1376 หลายเดือนก่อน
Petrus van Mastricht on "What is saving faith?" Discussion with Todd Rester
Theology of Hebrews, with Robert Cara
มุมมอง 3536 หลายเดือนก่อน
Theology of Hebrews, with Robert Cara
Peter Van Mastricht's theological system, with Todd Rester
มุมมอง 2576 หลายเดือนก่อน
Peter Van Mastricht's theological system, with Todd Rester
Who Wrote Hebrews? With Robert Cara
มุมมอง 3946 หลายเดือนก่อน
Who Wrote Hebrews? With Robert Cara
Who was Petrus Van Mastricht? With Todd Rester
มุมมอง 2207 หลายเดือนก่อน
Who was Petrus Van Mastricht? With Todd Rester

ความคิดเห็น

  • @katiecross8127
    @katiecross8127 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I think Jesus was talking about those trying to save themselves by obedience to the law.

  • @PhilVanVeldhuizen
    @PhilVanVeldhuizen 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very helpful insights

  • @patricabento9350
    @patricabento9350 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    We are the temple of the Holy Spirit

  • @5crownsoutreach
    @5crownsoutreach 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The question of the land promises is the central set of promises that determine whether you are a replacement theologian or a biblical one. Ezekiel 40-48 is the litmus test in this matter. God will keep His promises to His covenant nation of Israel, the nation in whom the church is engrafted.

    • @jeremiahduomai
      @jeremiahduomai 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The litmus test is whether one believes in Jesus or not.

  • @GadierCasiano
    @GadierCasiano 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Are you familiar with Everett Ferguson’s guide book on the topic of the Rule of Faith? I highly recommend it and I also think as you do that the rule of faith can be very beneficial in today’s Christianity.

  • @Tanjaicholan
    @Tanjaicholan 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ehrman should stick to Textual Criticism.

  • @lglg6950
    @lglg6950 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    LOTS OF INCEST...THATS WHAT IT SAYS LOL SICK!

  • @probablynotwearingpants6228
    @probablynotwearingpants6228 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    100% Cho-mo

  • @artdelgado8132
    @artdelgado8132 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Well said! Thank you brothers 🙏

  • @tomaszotremba
    @tomaszotremba 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Love it!

  • @georgemay8170
    @georgemay8170 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Jesus told Hs disciples to be alert.

  • @georgemay8170
    @georgemay8170 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    "The Rule of Faith" is grounded in the Gospel. It is Divine Faith in The Person of Jesus Christ our Lord. The Scriptures are interpreted by the Good News of who He is, the God=Man who fulfilled the everlasting Covenant.

  • @KenCunkle
    @KenCunkle หลายเดือนก่อน

    So what? It seems tome that what this really shows is that there is a large number of supposedly modern people whose religious outlook is trapped in a first-century mythological understanding.

    • @benp4025
      @benp4025 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      There are some who claim that the church didn't view Jesus as God until the 4th century. This evidence contradicts that claim. However, you're correct that it might not be very convincing to people who don't give any weight to the Bible or 1st and 2nd century Christian writers.

    • @AdamL-g7n
      @AdamL-g7n 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      everything is explained in the Quran, we believe in the gospel and torah as well. Jesus peace be upon him son of Mary is the messiah and messenger of all mighty God (the one you call the father we worship). Jesus spoke Aramaic which is the most similar language to arabic..

    • @KenCunkle
      @KenCunkle 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@AdamL-g7n What difference does it make that Jesus spoke Aramaic? None. Sorry, but the entire "big man in the sky" narrative is simply not a modern sensible way of looking at things. It's primtive superstition. You may as well believe that the stories in the Odyssey are historically accurate. The're not. They're great stories that contain much truth about the human experience, but as far as all that magical stuff, forget it. Same thing with what are unfortunately still living religions. It's understandable that people who are brought up in fear and poverty and ignorance believe that stuff--because it is provides comfort from the objective conditions of their lives-- or those who have been so heavily indoctrinated since birth that they cannot think their way out of their delusion. For everybody else, forget it. It's time for humanity to grow up.

  • @janicemorelock5791
    @janicemorelock5791 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonder if he could speak where the regular guy could understand him? I went to college and he is confusing to me.

    • @Amilton5Solas
      @Amilton5Solas หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have to read up on apologetics and get familiar with some of these terms. It’s not too hard. It was like that in the beginning for me too.

    • @ClarityandBrevity
      @ClarityandBrevity 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      These can be complicated topics! Here is a new video that is not as complicated: th-cam.com/video/T-1bOnHqjKo/w-d-xo.html

  • @padretienesseis
    @padretienesseis หลายเดือนก่อน

    Have you ever experienced someone who is lying to you about something, and they add a lot of extra detail that doesn't add up, but they want to persuade you to believe their story or side of an argument and yet are not being honest about what is actually written in context? Well, watch this video, and you'll witness that very thing.

  • @geekubs2778
    @geekubs2778 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks much for letting the mam speak and not interrupting. Great!

  • @Hambone3773
    @Hambone3773 หลายเดือนก่อน

    DipSensationalism

  • @JosephBoxmeyer
    @JosephBoxmeyer หลายเดือนก่อน

    You say that Adam had the law. Bible says otherwise in Romans five. That ABSENCE of law presents Paul's distinction between Adam and Moses. That eternality of law is your Roman Catholic scholastic assumption. The law was not made for the righteous, but for sinners. And Adam was given one commandment. One. And Adam was not promised righteousness and eternal life for a probational obedience. And Adam's offspring were not promised those rewards for his obedience. And worst is your heretical doctrine that Jesus was obligated to earn our righteousness and eternal life by His active obedience to law.

  • @JosephBoxmeyer
    @JosephBoxmeyer หลายเดือนก่อน

    "he would have obtained THAT REWARD offered to him in the covenant of works". Any Scripture texts for THAT REWARD? Or is the covenant of works only fiction?

  • @JosephBoxmeyer
    @JosephBoxmeyer หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Formal relationship".."Specific CommandSSSS". If this was a formal relationship, might we hope to find that covenant in the Bible? And WHAT SPECIFIC COMMANDSSSS plural? What texts do you have? And this was a two way covenant?

  • @ronlanter6906
    @ronlanter6906 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One of the elders at my church recommended *The Returning King* which I ordered and anxiously await for. God bless you both 🙏🏻✝

  • @CarpentersMinistry1
    @CarpentersMinistry1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So if understand you. Do believe in future sacrifices in the temple? Please explain

    • @ClarityandBrevity
      @ClarityandBrevity หลายเดือนก่อน

      No because Christ is the final sacrifice.

    • @CarpentersMinistry1
      @CarpentersMinistry1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ClarityandBrevity thanks

    • @ConceptsInHealth
      @ConceptsInHealth 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The blood sacrifices are a memorial--looking back to the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross. They also serve to ceremonially cleanse the people and items involved in coming before the Lord’s presence. (Ez 43:19-27) The blood of bulls and goats never took away sin--not before or after the Cross. There is very little death during those 1000 years. Think about it: no war, better food, someone who dies at 100 will be considered a child. Basically edenic conditions brought back. The sight of the burnt offerings will also be a powerful picture to the Jews and the nations that pilgrimage to the temple each year of the work of Jesus two plus millennia before. Keep in mind, in the 1000 year kingdom sin and disobedience still occur. Granted, it seems the special unction of the Holy Spirit given the nation Israel is something more than our current indwelling in this age. They are described as being ABLE to obey perfectly--not removal of free will--makes sense since they are a nation of priests, God’s mouthpiece to the nations. But the other nations don’t have that same Holy Spirit indwelling. In Zechariah we are told delegations from all nations must come to Jerusalem annually to worship and keep the feast of tabernacles--no doubt burnt offerings with blood are included. If they DISOBEY God will punish them with drought and PLAGUE. Sin will be present, but as in Old Testament it will be dealt with swiftly. The picture of the believing little flock dwelling in Jerusalem in divine communism in Acts 2-3 was a small picture of kingdom conditions. The inclusion of the incident with Ananias and Sapphira shows two things: sin can happen, but the 12 judges on the twelve thrones will have perfect knowledge, even to the reading of people’s minds, and judgment will be sure (death) and swift. That will certainly have the effect of keeping the sin nature at bay!!!

  • @PhilVanVeldhuizen
    @PhilVanVeldhuizen หลายเดือนก่อน

    First Marvel reference on the channel? Guess I'll have to go back and rewatch everything.

  • @yoyocswpg
    @yoyocswpg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Paul does nothing but explains and expounds the kingdom proclaimation of Jesus"💡 What a pioneering insight from Ridderbos 🎉 I absolutely love this ❤

  • @yoyocswpg
    @yoyocswpg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it ok to say the resurrection is God's intended purpose for the death of Christ, not just His approval on its efficacy 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @yoyocswpg
    @yoyocswpg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Depends on the preacher tho 😂

  • @yoyocswpg
    @yoyocswpg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Simple and clear ❤

  • @yoyocswpg
    @yoyocswpg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love this ❤

  • @kingpeer14
    @kingpeer14 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    pffffffff jesus again?

  • @dgv951
    @dgv951 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Book of Revelation is apocalyptic not estacalogical as the title of the Book states as well as the the Greek text.

  • @thebusstop
    @thebusstop 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Always interesting to hear about the enlightenment from those who were there in the beginning. "A strong period of doubt" being a kind of pre-requisite of enlightenment is still with us today. To me, it's ironic that many people say Van Til is an enlightenment man when you hear these kinds of things. VT appealed to Scripture as the most rational basis of thought - what can be more anti-enlightenment, even if VT uses Kant's terminology sometimes?

  • @normchristopherson5799
    @normchristopherson5799 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Darby was not the first dispensationalist. Long before Darby, the apostle Paul was a dispensationalist.

    • @dgv951
      @dgv951 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True, two dispensations.

    • @Bombaycompany1776
      @Bombaycompany1776 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This age and the age to come. "This age" being the present evil age, and "the age to come" being the eternal state.

  • @rickperez1336
    @rickperez1336 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you! I am new to covenant theology and these new insights are very helpful ! I am also reading Harrison’s book right now! Blessings

  • @ethelmcclyde6499
    @ethelmcclyde6499 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am fairly new to Covenant theology, thanks for making it so clear to me!

  • @TroyStevens430
    @TroyStevens430 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🎯

  • @wewillsurvive1776
    @wewillsurvive1776 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love this, thank you for your clear teaching.

  • @georgemay8170
    @georgemay8170 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The principle of "form and substance" rooted in the Gospel helps the reader of the Old Testament determine what the current forms of the day direct the believer's attention. To "know God in Christ, the fulfillment of the everlasting covenant," is the purpose of the types, the forms of the one substance, which is the person, Christ Jesus.

  • @ParticularBaptist
    @ParticularBaptist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Glad I found your channel. I believe the New Covenant is the covenant of Grace, where Christ is the mediator of that covenant and that covenant alone. And in scripture I only see the atonement flow thru the New Covenant. I believe this covenant was promised in the OT and fulfilled in the NT. What are your thoughts?

    • @ClarityandBrevity
      @ClarityandBrevity 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ParticularBaptist I would see the covenant of grace implemented already in the OT

  • @Tom-cv7sf
    @Tom-cv7sf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BODY OF CHRIST 🎉 Sons of God ❤ New Jerusalem 🎉 Temple Made without Hands ❤ 🤔

  • @Tom-cv7sf
    @Tom-cv7sf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    CHERUBIM R US 🔥🔨 Like David's Tabernacle You are the tent 🎪 The Spirit of God is in YOU ❤ The WORD is written on your hearts 🥰 sABBAth with Daddy 24-7 ❤ A LIVING ARK OF THE COVENANT 🔥 A TEMPLE MADE WITHOUT HANDS ❤️ A ROYAL PRIESTHOOD ❤ CHERUBIM R US 🔥🔨 Four Faced LIVING CREATURE,, a being in which dwells the FULLNESS OF LIFE 🎉

  • @Over-for-now
    @Over-for-now 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Darby was absolutely correct. God had a remnant of Israel THAT HE WILL complete HIS promises and everlasting covenant with

  • @Over-for-now
    @Over-for-now 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Romans 16:25. Paul's gospel given to him by Jesus himself. It WAS a MYSTERY NOT known before

  • @demontejohnson4102
    @demontejohnson4102 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Noticed, and you hit it on point at 2:15 with dispensationalism. Dispensationalist mold their theology to match their interpretation of bible prophecies rather than interpret bible prophecies based on an established theology brought from the text.

  • @qwerty-so6ml
    @qwerty-so6ml 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Genesis 1 is ELOHIM (Lucifer and the fallen angels). They made man in their image. Man is an idol, a trap to hunt angels. One Gospel: Gospel (GOOD ANGEL) of Reconciliation. Jesus Christ came into THEIR kingdom to reconcile fallen angels unto Himself. We are the fallen angels (ELOHIM) kept in DNA chains of darkness. If you do not confess being a fallen angel in Lucifer's kingdom, then you are an unbeliever. Unbeliever = those that claim to be made in the image of ELOHIM(gods). REPENT FALLEN ANGELS.

  • @kims144
    @kims144 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are still people who call her the mother of Jesus and Not the mother of God. Nestorians did not die out. Unfortunately, many of our reformed people are so ill-taught about church history that they also want to call her Christo-tokos and not Theotokos.

  • @Ditchdiggerpewsitter
    @Ditchdiggerpewsitter 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I know that this will likely elicit some push back. However, as a preterist eschatologically, I know that I am off-side with the creedal understanding of future coming of Christ. Even so, I did appreciate the expansion on this text and the actual Greek reading. We obviously disagree on some important and pivotal things on eschatology but, for me, even though labeled heretic (and I am according to the test used) Christ is still Lord and reigning in victory. Blessings, Love br. David - Canada.

  • @Amilton5Solas
    @Amilton5Solas 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was very helpful!

  • @johnwindisman2803
    @johnwindisman2803 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lets talk about a fictional character who people believe is real. Come join us for a discussion of the Sith of Markoo AKA Jesus. How delusional must you be to believe in this nonsense! HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHA

  • @TaylorWalston
    @TaylorWalston 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its only a mystery if you try to force imaginary answers on stories that never included them.

    • @russellhenckel2887
      @russellhenckel2887 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Never mind that Paul says numerous times in the NT tff he at Christ is the mystery revealed

    • @TaylorWalston
      @TaylorWalston 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@russellhenckel2887 not sure what you mean here..

    • @russellhenckel2887
      @russellhenckel2887 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TaylorWalston if I understood your comment correctly, you are saying that poythress is forcing Christ into the OT and that the OT does not allude to Christ. Please correct me if I am misunderstanding

    • @TaylorWalston
      @TaylorWalston 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@russellhenckel2887 are you familiar with iron chef? Combining ideas and making up a story that then appears to combine them is what I think happened.

    • @russellhenckel2887
      @russellhenckel2887 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TaylorWalston so then why does Paul say in Galatians 3 that God preached the Gospel of Christ to Abraham beforehand? Why does Hebrews say that Abraham was looking to a heavenly land ? Why does Moses prophesy about one like Him that is ultimately fulfilled in Christ? Why does Isaiah prophesy the suffering servant in Isaiah 53 that is fulfilled in Christ? Who is the one like a Son of Man in Daniel? I could go on and on. Christ is permeated everywhere in the OT. The apostles affirmed this and connected Christ to the interpretation of the OT prophecies

  • @douglasscott7551
    @douglasscott7551 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    According to you and your fiction