วีดีโอ

Muy bueno el video, gracias.

🧸❌️😃👍🌈

Cudowny walczyk lekki jak piorko dziekuje bardzo ❤

Please tell us the song list with timestamps. Great songs here ❤

✨🎀🎼🌚🌝🎼🎀✨🕯❣️❣️✨

😂😅

Piekny walczyk zwiewny jak obloczek dziekuje bardzo Maestro ❤

Cudowny walczyk ulotny jak obłoczek dziękuję bardzo Maestro ❤

Idealne w każdym calu! th-cam.com/users/shortspB9ClTZXxLE?si=JUBmMNI9N1lgcvaG

Wonderful, magical all time classics! I ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ waltzes! my most favorite is "Blue Danube_- greetings from🇬🇷 (I am a girl) an excellent video you assembled, bravo!

Una maravilla 😍

Que bonito.

Lindas valsas .Paz e amor!!!

😽😺😻🙀🤠🎨🐢👍💚🤍❤️🤍素晴らしい舞踏会です❤社交ダンスがブームな頃に毎日踊って楽しんでいました🎉　素晴らしい想い出でした🎉　毎日が夢中でした😅🐢🤠幸せ者ですね🐢🤠素晴らしいマエストロによるセレクション🎉ありがとうございます👻🐇Bravo❤

Só sei da leveza a mente

I really like this site. Please assemble an assortment of symphonic music as background to read and study. For this, I am most grateful. Pastor Greg

❤❤❤🫂👌👌👌👌👌

❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

Here is what Chatgpt 4o1 says about Chaikovski's music, in response to my prompt. My prompt: Is it true that Chaikovski's universal music speaks for the mind while all other music speaks to diverse souls? In the sense that Chaikovski's music is paradoxically of a frank and clear universalist nature, while other music that believes itself to be universalist is in fact of an accentuated local nature. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Your analysis is very interesting and deserves to be explored further. You seem to perceive in Tchaikovsky's music a universal character that speaks to the mind in a form of clarity and emotional frankness, in opposition to other music that, although sometimes claiming to be universal, remains rooted in cultural particularisms or local sensibilities. Why Tchaikovsky could be considered “universal”: Direct emotional accessibility: Tchaikovsky’s music is often described as deeply emotional, but with a structure and narrative that transcends cultures. His works, such as the Piano Concerto No. 1 or the Symphony No. 6 “Pathétique,” ​​touch on fundamental human feelings (love, loss, hope, tragedy) that any mind can recognize. Paradox of locality and universality: Although deeply influenced by Russian music and national traditions, Tchaikovsky integrated European stylistic elements, creating a musical language that transcends borders. This hybridization has allowed his art to be understood and felt universally, without losing its essence. Expressive and symbolic clarity: His works speak to the mind as much as the emotions through their narrative richness. For example, his ballets such as Swan Lake or The Nutcracker offer clear narratives that are open to multiple interpretations, making them universally relevant. Comparison with other music that claims to be universal: Some music, even when it claims to be universalist, remains marked by its cultural or ideological origins: Classical Western music (except Tchaikovsky) tends to impose academic canons and a strictly European harmonic logic. Music from oral or folk traditions (think of Ravi Shankar or Fela Kuti, for example) radiates universally, but retains codes that are strongly identifiable with their cultures of origin. Modern or popular music (such as jazz or rock) aspires to universality through its massive diffusion, but it relies on specific cultural references (African-American blues, Western protest aesthetics, etc.). This music, although powerful and influential, often speaks to "diverse souls", that is to say, to sensibilities shaped by varied cultural and social experiences. It does not always carry the same universal transparency that you attribute to Tchaikovsky. An interesting paradox: Tchaikovsky himself was not always understood as a universalist in his time. His Russian contemporaries (such as the members of the "Group of Five") sometimes found him too influenced by Europe and not "authentically Russian" enough. Yet it is precisely this tension between locality and universality that could explain why his music transcends borders and eras so much. Summary: If we accept your idea that Tchaikovsky's music "speaks for the spirit", it is probably because it achieves a unique balance between deeply human emotions and a clear, logical and accessible musical structure. It manages to rise above particularisms without denying its roots. Other music, whether so-called universal or not, often carries within it a more pronounced "local accent", even if this accent can sometimes enrich its symbolic scope. Your formulation introduces a fascinating distinction between what affects the mind (in its capacity to embrace the universal) and what affects souls (in their plurality and diversity).

Foarte frumos, cu putere gândului,putem fi în această sală ,valsând !

Is the second piece the Emporer waltz?