วีดีโอ

Learn more about Walter & Lao Russell th-cam.com/users/liveG1hFH-hixFk?si=-HbbBP_mA4h11cip

You should continue posting video !

Let me pay please, open it back please

Ayeee let’s go Scott glad to see you reviving the channel! Super stoked, saw you on the subreddit. Be ready for the ridicule you’ll face on here lol. Hey have you looked into the work of Ken Wheeler? Look at his TH-cam videos on magnetism, he knows this stuff. I’ll probably meet you and the crew one day I’m 19 and I read The Universal One over a year ago, it read like poetry. Definitely life changing. Best of luck brother

Thus, the explanation of ocean tides . . . the potentials of the earth/moon shift with the moon's orbital rotation around the earth.

have you worked out the orbtal mechanics of the earth-moon system .. on paper .. according to Russel AND according to other systems ? both Einsteinian Relativity and Russellian (as described in this video) fail that test of usefulness, predictability ... also, about the voice - artificial means insincere, pretend honesty, so in a context of communication .. ?? in the i department, it makes the mistakes it's told to make, faster than humanly possible .. also, about the grift of T. Howard . he's an actor pretending to be Elon, hoping for funding or a part in the Movie, (appearances on Rogan = demo reels for casting agents), watch his face and mannersims .. but his "science" is acting, professional fake sincerity, but listen to him talk .. verbal diarrhea and mind-mush from many sources and nothing much of actual Russellian geometry in it anywhere, and he makes easily refutable claims about "his" patent and it's "value" and use by others. Patent Applied for; never Granted; quickly Abandoned, but it was non-patentable to begin with, bereft of original invention, unless one includes picking gear to order and buy with assigning placement thereof as inventive, somehow. .. as for quasi-satallite systems, eg. earth-moon and pluto-charron, your derivation from Russel cannot hold. p.s. editted for clarity and speling misteaks. d'Oh!

Very nice, thank you for that explanation. It would be great to delve into the magnet, so we could see how Walter concluded that the same laws apply to both the electrical plates and the magnet. Looking forward to these types of investigative videos, very interesting indeed!

Great beakdown! Its a lot to grasp, but great job laying out the basics 🤙

This is MAGA science right. Like the new science for the 'other' people right??

At what point do electrons turn into Mass isn't that the next Question,? I would.

Looks like what the Egyptians were working on, not only that but Geometric Mass magnetic structures in another Dimension will form a Solid Mass.Give me 5#

there is no electron.

If a theory of everything exists, free will doesnt, so until one is found, free will is the theory of everything. The universe is alive and itself has free willl. Quantum mechanics is a representaton of free will, the probability wave of electrons being everywhere but mostly here is just just like peoples behaviour, acting in predictable manner with extremes. The idea of physics being the same everywhere is also a false assumption i believe, physics is also dynamic due to free will but the universe is so huge and moves so slow, we wont see these changes in our lifetime. This is why our models dont agree with JWST or reality these days, our models and udnerstanding is just wrong.

So the battery doesnt really store energy. Its a wrong term to say it is a storage battery. Because it does not store. It divides the equilibrium between two cells. One cell has more and the other has less. Thats why flow is necessary to restore the balance between two unbalanced cells. There is no pushing or pulling forces. Electrons willingly move like a log on a river just riding the flow of the water. The sea do not attract the log. The log find its balance there.

PLEASE NOTE A CORRECTION: the part about the magnet is incomplete and part of the explanation may be just plain WRONG . I'm sorry!!! I will do a better video explaining how a magnet is created and the properties it has through the lens of Russell's concept. So please don't bash me about the magnet. But anything else, please bash away LOL I look forward to your comments!

Greetings and Salutations Scot. Thank you for creating and sharing this video. Since elementary school, in Brooklyn, NY, I knew and felt something was a little off. I have had the wonderful experience of "Chopping it up" with the 5% nation, Nation of Islam, Hebrew Israelites, Orthodox Jew, Differing sects of the Muslim community, Christians and Agnostics. I also enjoyed access to the East-West, Strand and so many more Book stores. I became aware of Walter Russell through Santos B. I have grown and expanded greatly. I am able to navigate distractions in the joy of knowing "All is One". I am an engineer , scientist, DJ, Athlete and soil advocate ( The soil is where most of the elements play and is the source of human physical structures; further emphasizing We are ONE). I now live in Northern Virginia and recently found out the Russell museum is two (2) hours south. There is an event there on 9/28 - 9/29 but I had already signed up to participate in a Triathlon Relay. Walter speaks to the Natural Layer which is the base class of the Universal One. Using the base class AKA Superclass, men derived a class inheriting all properties therein and has run orthogonally against the base class causing so many distractions. To me , this is the ultimate game where you can check your skills , make mistakes and get at it again with the goal of leveling up into the Knowing!

Russell's explanation of gravity is simpler than Einstein's, plus it is easily observable. Looking forward to more "Foundations of Physics" videos. 👍

Thanks for explaining Russell's concepts in such simple terms. Alternative concepts can face hostility, but being so simple anyone can consider for themselves. - Another example of simple and observable contraction and expansion cycles are rain-drops, which travel in two opposite directions, compressing into matter, and expanding into gas. - The effects of gravity and weight reverse when planets and rain drops begin to decay back outwards. Cause and effect.

Yes, all things are the One thing disturbed. The disturbance gives us the frequencies, the vibrations, the waves, and its return gives us gravity, electrostatics, Dielectricity.

No, Gravity is not a thing that is "pushing" "light" inward, and radiation is not a thing that is pushing light outwards. The All thing, the Absolute thing, The One Thing disturbed is an outward motion of force and an inward motion of return to One. All things are One Thing.

Eddingtons concept of The arrow of time works quite well for many things..... and the concept of linear progression is quite good for common purposes. But its wrong. Time is not a straight line. Nor is it a circle as echoed by many on the fringe. Its a spiral.

Why would we use Walter Russell's concept? By the same token we don't need Gravity if we have Electromagnetism? Who says we don't want to watch a 35 minute video? You make a lot of assumptions and pass them off as demi-facts here.

Great video Scot!!

How do you measure the motion of light

"Cold slows down molecules of water and turns them into ice..." Bad semantics - energy transfers from the higher-energy environment to the lower,, permitting the phase change. Poor word choice will lead inevitably to error in thought and calculation.

Flipping thorough the chemistry section of The One a bit, there are several inconcistencies. He predicts several new elements wich we haven't found yet and according to standard theory never will. The most obvious poking point in the chemistry section, would be his expectation for the elements to loop around after Oganesson, wich according to regular predicitons ill not happen and researchers are already working on creating element 120. Other things like the proposed Hydron does he mean Neutrons? That couldn't be it either and Isotopes aren't accounted for at all. It feels like reading Nostradamus The Prophecies. It's frimly planted in the time and limited knowlege of the author. Another thing I'm puzzled by is him claiming, that Carbon has the highest melting point. At one atmopshere of pressure though Carbon transitions directly form solid to gas phase at ~3900 °C. I like the idea of arranging the periodic table into a spiral though.

I've been trying to read through and this explanation has helped! Cheers

This video is an example why people need to learn proper physics and math.

😂😂😂😂

Why do all magic new age astrology bullshit guys are so eager to pretend you're "scientific" when you just ignore science to promote your religion? I can CLEARLY hear that this guy failed physics, lol

Your content is lovely. Your voice is very good. Loved the poster and the t-shirt. My first view of your work was this presentation. I get a lot of science suggestions from all over the world, mostly jn English language. You have a nice Dad vibe. Do cut away to visual content and have a little brush at your desk to tidy up the look. Otherwise very viewable human. Keep at it 🎉

Awesome

Honestly I gave up listening after you kept going on about how it makes you feel and not talkiing about the actual concept whatsoever.

ok, so I've always thought consciousness is the structure upon which matter sits - the scaffolding of existence, and IS the balancing of dark and light energies - dark energy being those ephemeral fields like emotions, thought waves (both in and outside of the head), and the interaction of quarks; light being matter and light and all those things we have discovered, then named, then described, in our attempts to control the energies - its the combination of those that is the breathing existence. definitely rhythm/movement brings being into form. just my two cents

Mathmatics. Yup.

Maybe if he could reduce it to EM and take gravity to be an emergent divergence of EM forces. Einstein's theory was based off Lorentz and Voigt which both posit an aether.

Russel knows what's up

I am a nobody but I have something that can help everyone especially my countrymen to understand what is happening on this world. What if i told you that manifestation is sujective. And no manifestation will occur if manipulated and theres no way you cant cheat it since a gatekeeper is embeededcon our body. I dont need you to trust me just believe on me like the coincidence that i was brought to your channel seeking for a platform that would listen soulfully. Eyes dont lie my brother. Love and peace to all of you❤

Without experimental proof, these alternative theories are just mental masturbation.

Yout got Flatearthers, Hollow earthers and this. Who knows what we will be seeing next...

fascinating idea, ill have to look into this

Great video! I am looking forward to getting to understand Walter's concepts, thank you for explaining! It would be very cool to know some measurements we could do pertaining to the properties Walter attributes to light, like the plane you mentioned. Also how his concept works of focusing light with coils, like in his optical dynamo, would be awesome too understand eventually.

1x1=2

Sacred Geometry saved my life and gave me purpose beyond my wildest dreams

Why is mathematics misspelled on your t-shirt? Makes it hard to take you seriously.

Criticism of Russell Science, which generally refers to Bertrand Russell's views on science and philosophy, often revolves around a few key points: Overemphasis on Logic and Reductionism: Russell's approach heavily favored logic and reductionism, sometimes at the expense of understanding the complexities and nuances of scientific practice. Critics argue that this can lead to an oversimplified view of science, neglecting the importance of empirical methods, historical context, and the social dimensions of scientific discovery. Inadequate Account of Scientific Realism: Russell's views often flirted with a kind of logical empiricism, which some see as insufficiently addressing the realist aspect of science-the idea that science aims to describe a reality independent of our observations. Critics like Karl Popper argued that Russell's perspective doesn't adequately deal with the falsifiability and tentative nature of scientific theories. Misunderstanding of Quantum Mechanics: Russell struggled with the implications of quantum mechanics, a field that challenges classical logic and intuition. His attempts to reconcile these with his logical framework are seen by some as inadequate or misguided. Failure to Address the Role of Paradigms: Thomas Kuhn's work on the structure of scientific revolutions highlighted the importance of paradigms and paradigm shifts in science, something that Russell's more static and logic-focused approach did not account for. Kuhn's ideas about how science operates in practice suggest that Russell's view was too rigid and idealized. These critiques suggest that while Russell's contributions to philosophy and logic are profound, his views on science may oversimplify or misrepresent the complexities and evolving nature of scientific inquiry.

Highly suggest looking into Dewey B Larson’s Reciprocal System, and the book “The Ra Material.” They both approve of the idea that light is the foundation of the universe, and expands upon it exponentially.

light beyond photonic light speed is tachyon to instantaneous is torsion torus fields

been working with consciousness as a practice research, this resonates the big bang is a long ongoing wavelength with unfolding enterprises like dark flow and great attractor

i meditated out of body arrived under a waterfall of light but the light water was like effervescing star snowflakes that had bliss emotion,iwent to touch. then saw my arm was made of same translucent bluish whitey light