วีดีโอ

Not entirely true. Candy wouldn't probably have let them leave even after Shultz concedes to a handshake. I think Shultz ultimately realizes this and chose the part to end Candy as well.

It's like a paid internship.

I believe the true protagonist of this movie is actually Dr. Shultz not Django.

Lets not forget that King recently saw a man ripped apart by dogs. He probably felt some guilt about standing by and lettong that happen.

This is full of random neatpicking and really reaching, and also base on mostly todays era of morality, you don't really considered the time period of the place, and other thing that he did in the movie and really hammering this idea of him using Django for his own benefit. He also free those slaves in the opening telling them which way to go to the save place, he is also tries to stop Candyland people from killing that one guy which will screw this whole "personal reasoning" of him, and let's talk about this payment thing which is ridiculous, only 1/3? only? Again you clearly don't really care about the time period of the movie, Schultz is giving him one in a million opportunity, that is a literal heaven, he is teaching him not just how to read but also how to act as a better human, and not just mindless scared slave. 1/3 as an essentially a random intern that getting a free education, 24/7 protection, and being free from the violation of human right? proper food, proper clothes, proper job. Also Schultz is not really teaching Django to be a bounty hunter randomly, that is literally because of Django killed the first 2 of that brothers, he takes him as his student so Django can use his skill for a job and also being a bounty hunter can gives you a lot of benefit like people will not attack you randomly since you are the law and Django can't have another job btw, he is not considered to be human in that time. I can go on and on about this but one thing for sure is that your take is so bad.

You lost the moment you unironically said “white savior” lol. It’s not as complicated as you’re making it out to

This is absolutely ridiculous. Tarantino wrote the script with some ideas, then he probably did some changes while filming and editing, then actors added their interpretation and now this reviewer is making it all up as the characters exists in reality.

Bro you're overcomplicating things for one he's of Germanic descent for two It's called doing the right thing... Always gotta make it about race... What a Gen Z perspective unless you're using an AI to talk😂😂😂 If your word is worth anything you won't hide this comment or delete it...

Terrible review and explanation, this is why you just have 2k subscribers. Thats a lot of yapping

auf wiedersehen

He trained Jango. That took time, effort and money for bullets and food. That is why Django only gets 1/3 the bounty. It's actually pretty generous.

Garcia Kevin Garcia Paul Young Ruth

There’s no way these are your genuine thoughts on his character and this isn’t just a rage bait to get more comments and a better TH-cam video. Say what you really think you don’t need a hot take.

Over analyzing this at its finest...lets not forget it is a movie and it had to have a dramatic ending instead of them just shaking hands and walking out the door. But i guess to justify Shultz"s actions (which is hard to do because it was basically suicide) he had already lost $12000 which was a years profit. He had NO intentions of spending that type of money which probably left him rock bottom. So that...and with the torture of seeing a man ripped to shreads was too much..and the cherry on the sundae is to shake hands afterwards proved to be too much.

because he suffered a gunshot wound to the heart

Candy represented everything Schultz hated, and he got the better of him. I understand why he couldn't resist

Schultz’s death is nothing more than Contrived writing. His actions had a very high likelihood of causing the death of Django and Hildi. At best they both end up in slavery again, which almost happened. King had and ego and he is morally ambiguous at times. But, after all the selfless “fathering” of Django, saying he was responsible for him because he gave him his freedom. Plus, the extreme lengths he went to in the plan to save Hildi and the significance this has for a German. Moreover, he dropped $12k without hesitation to save her, and themselves. It was a disgraceful end to his character. That doesn’t make any sense. It would have been better if candy one him over and he turns on Django, I’m not saying better that would suck too, but less bad than what actually happened. But it still gets worse. The hidden sleeve derringer king shoots candy with was all ready established to have two shots in the movie, but he just takes the shotgun blast leaving Django to be hopelessly out numbered. Then Django, who’s shown to have quick fucking hands, just lets the henchmen unload on king. The movie needed Django to be the hero so is CONTRIVED a way to get king out of the way for the true Star to shine. And this scene is terrible, I don’t mind the rest but this scene pisses me off every time I watch it. And I saw this movie in theatres at 15. It’s so F*cking stupid it’s unbelievable. Quinton is a great writer and but he really wrote himself into a corner. And given he hasn’t addressed it publicly, he knows what he did.

this whole video is just overthinking. shultz killed candy bc it was so easy and such a good win for him and i dont think shultz was just "using django" he's just in awe of his situation and has such an eye for showmanship he wants to see the ultimate hero win (german fairytale with broomhilda)

Thanks for the effort man bit this ain‘t it.

It's impressive how badly you misunderstood the movie

I think one of the reasons i like the writeing for Shultz character is explicitly because how human hes portrayed, people are contradictive, people dont always hold ideas that seem compatible, people might spontaneously do something totally aganst their charicter for no reason other than it felt right at that moment. Haveing him written inconsistantly makes him more realistic as a character

Watch it a 7th time, being given 1/3 of the bounty collections, when you don't have to take any of the risk to get he info, plan, get resources, have no connections to find people or use their resources, being given not only knowledge, but power over how to use it is not enslaving him again...but a lot of people who don't create or lead their own trade don't understand that.

He killed him because he is a dentist and he is a candyman

Implying that Shultz doesn't care for Django is wild. He literally risks his life to go save Brumhilde. He also tries to save D'Artagnan before Django stops him and is plagued with visions of his death immediately before he kills Candy. Shultz isn't a perfect person, but he clearly detests cruelty and values the lives of innocent people.

I love some takes on the idea: >the doctor shoot him because he is tired of all the shit of Calvin (thinking about the dogs since the begin of the scene), also because Calvin is also mad with the doctor being more smart than him >Dentist versus Candy >He gets the "i couldnt resist" and never tries to shot any goon because he break the rule of "old stories" when the guy gives you shelter is like sacred following you know all this norse/german stories like Brunhildr (in fact the doctor with that bear is kinda Odin type of wizard god lmaooo you get the idea) >Other guy say is because Tarantino wanted a third act about gore kills "sorry i couldnt resist"

Points i wanna say because we talk about a Quentin Tarantino Movie here, a Movie by a Man that is keen for details: 1: Schulz doesn't enslave Django, he is just playing with the thought of enslaving him in a debtful way, to ''use'' him to find the Brittle Brothers (Schulz hates Slavery, Django was free from the start) which he has problems to find, he's exploiting Django in a way 2: Schulz keeping 2/3 of the Bounties has it's reasons: we are set in the South of America, many stores doesn't allow black people to even enter their property -> he pays for almost everything for Django i assume -> Clothes, Food, Weapons and Ammo etc. 3: And then the Killing of Candie, you need to see the Picture of the WHOLE Candyland Chapter to understand why Schulz killed Candy during the ''Contract signing scene'', - after they went to Greenville, Django developed a bit of an negative attitude because Broomhilda is getting nearer and nearer, he's getting careless -> he gets cocky alot that goes on Schulz's nerves (the scene when he scolds Django for antagonizing Candie and the Slaves too much shows it) - Schulz scheme of being the ''Mandingo Fighter'' interested SLAVER goes hard against his nature but its the only way to even get INTO Candyland get's on his nerves, - the constant triggerhappy Guards/Bodyguard with the Sawn-off Shotgun, Candies Lawyer Mr. Moguy and his bootlicking attitude for Candie, Steven's hardcore racism and Candies sister as the brainless Yes-Woman she is are going on his nerves, - seeing the slaves beating eachother to death in the Parlor for entertainment and especially seeing D'Artagnan being ripped apart by Candie's Dogs went HARD on his nerves, - and first and foremost: Candie as a Person! -> has a french-kink -> doesn't know a word in french, doesn't know ANYTHING about french culture in general -> Slaver, Rassist, sees black people as way lesser and inferior ''Creatures'' (letting D'Artagnan be killed by Dogs, Mandingo Fighting in general, constant use of the N-Word, Black Folks are ''Goods'' not Humans, the Skull scene with the ''Three Dimples Theory''), -> the constant threats by Candie, first through a mean undertone during fights, later being held at Gunpoint and being forced to a really bad deal for Broomhilda, -> Candie as the hardcore know-it-all that he is but he is actually an unedjucated idiot --- all of that accumulates until the White-Cake scene in the Library: the constant repeat of the same tune of the harp that is played, the constant mocking by Candie, the Laughter of Steven and Candies Goons, the praising of Candie by Mr. Moguy, it leads to Schulz becoming careless himself when he started to begin his ''mocking'' of Candie with his ''Normally i would say ''Auf Wiedersehen'''' speech and before that the mocking of Candie's missing knowledge about the Author of the ''Three Musketeers'' Alexandre Dumas (who's Characters Name ''D'Artagnan'' Candie uses for his price fighting slave) being black by pointing out ''What Dumas would make of all this'' hit against candie, the ''insisting on the Handshake'' and threataning of Django and Broomhilda by Candie was the icing ontop that ultimately sealed Schulz's unfortunate fate BUT every man has his limits, even a professional like King Schulz

He died because he was shot. It was quite clear 🤨

I understand where your coming from, but at the same time i feel if even shultz did accept the handshake, theres really nothing stopping candy from killing him, taking his money and enslaving django and his wife. He would had no repercussions if he really screwed them all over for murdering Schultz. Candy was pissed he was getting screwed over and ready to kill djangos wife over this deal and you see candy is very self centered and wanna be the smart man in the room. Bested by a dentist and a slave....nah he really could have done an evil power move by accepting the hand shake, getting him to his level, having his morals rejected and killing shultz, enslaved the two and end the story there.

A lot of people could understand this if you simply replaced Shultz with yourself and Candie with Stalin. I know I wouldn't be able to resist.

If his intentions and heart were truly in support of Django and his wife he would’ve turned a blind eye to candy and gritted his teeth until they made it out. By being rash he almost got all 3 of them killed.

Bruh you're reaching .

Well, I’m glad someone finally sees what I see

I love that you’ve come to this conclusion. It’s so clear that Shultz suffers from the white savior complex trope. To think otherwise is to be surface level and disingenuous.

I think you misunderstand Shultz because you misunderstand bounty hunting. Also django was the one who really wanted his wife back, why the hell would shultz help him at all and not just be done with him after he killed the brittle brothers. Him giving django 33% is extremely generous, considering all Django had to do was learn to use a gun. Shultz had all the licenses and documentation to hunt bounties. Thats a GREAT damn deal when you’re just a gun AND you get assistance saving a loved one from slavery. Say what you will, i think he killed candie because he couldn’t bear the fact that he had just legally purchased a slave. He felt the handshake made it more legitimate, he was offended, so he killed him. At least thats my theory.

Spoiled by a damn TH-cam recommendation

Schultz was a smidge less crazy than john brown but he was a hell of a lot more deadly.

I think he just really wanted to kill a dragon and be like a folk story hero

For me. Schultz is a good dude. Ultimately flawed, as everyone is. But still, in my eyes, a good man

Came for the Django analysis, Stayed for the top tier brain rot.

Great video but you missed a important last detail.... Candi quite literally suspected "a trick up his sleeve" theirfore he is so aggressively intentional about the handshake, Schultz sensing that it was his last moment to either get the drop on Candi or submit to all 3 of them killed he chooses to sacrifice himself to give a chance for both Django and his wife to get away. Even know his actions up into the moment may have been for selfish reasons he allowed his last moment to be a gap for his friend to potentially escape and was literally the only thing he could do in that moment, I say good death and Good Guy.

Give Django that much money is way more than what he should be giving him wdym 😂 it’s his business, he’s teaching him to read and write, he’s feeding him, clothing him, and getting Django everything he wants? Why is he even paying Django in the first place he’s more of an intern than an apprentice 💀

What you missed for me completely is that characters grow during the movie. Dr Schulz might have started with different ideals, but at the end I truly believe he was fully against slavery, and actually thought of django as an very good friend of his

This one of the worst analysis o Doc Shultz that I’ve ever seen

0:00 Well I’m by no means an expert, but I’d say it has something to do with being shot in the chest

All these dumbass video essay channels have the absolute worst takes to seem “different” and get more attention by going against the grain, but just end up looking stupid. Don’t ever say some dumb shit like this ever again

L take. Schultz is a good man

i was looking forward to watching the movie but then this spoils the death of an awesome character bro great job

no

You framed the entire video as if bounty hunting wasn't a law abiding hunting of convicted criminals on bounties issued by the state.

She's the reason why I prefer sub over dub.