วีดีโอ

Thanks JitendraSingh, glad to know you found this informative.

Thanks for the comment, glad to know you found this useful

We have discussed this, hope you are good. Thanks for the question

Glad to know you found this useful. Thanks for the comment.

th-cam.com/video/Ap4l8y1kc5o/w-d-xo.html

th-cam.com/video/m_oT_dHaWSc/w-d-xo.html

Here you go..they are all part of same segment routing playlist. here is URL for complete playlist th-cam.com/video/PWMK9DQqISI/w-d-xo.html

Thanks for the comment. Glad to know you found the session useful. Hopefully I will find the time soon for L2VPN. Thanks for asking that as well..

Thanks for the comment. Glad that you found the video useful

Thanks for the comment. Glad to know it was useful

Thanks, glad to know you found this useful

Thanks for the comment. Glad to know that you are finding the content useful...

Thanks a lot Ravi bhai..glad that you enjoyed the content

Thanks for the comment. Glad to know you found this useful

Np at all, thanks for the comment

Thanks Vishnu, glad that you liked the video.

Thanks for the comment. Glad to know you found this useful..

Thanks for the comment. Glad to know you liked the content. Yes sure, committed to it.

Thanks Santosh ji, glad to know you found the content useful.

Thanks Philip, glad to know it was useful..

Thanks for the comment. So glad that you found this valuable.

Thanks for the comment. Glad to know you found the video useful

Thanks Santosh Mishra ji..glad to know it was useful for you..

Thanks Syed, glad that you liked the content.

haha, now that you noticed I can say sustainability and environmental perspective.. Good observation btw..

Thanks for the comment, glad to know that you found the video useful. Yes, EVPN doesnt change anything on the host side. It is still flood and learn. But with EVPN, Switch learn the destination MAC address via EVPN control plane, it can supress that flooding at the vtep itself whereas your VPLS or traditional switching doesnt do that. Hope this helps.

@@emergingtechbytes how does it help if arp broadcast is happening for host to learn destination Mac n sent to all other PEs then at that time only pe can also populate their table?? Is PE has got mechanism to look as destination ip of arp packet to reply back the destination Mac?? N so don't forward arp broadcast to other pes.

@@minalagrawal5638 From the host side, there will be no change. It will follow the usual mechanism. But when the arp packets come to switch, now here is the change. Via EVPN Route Type 2, Switch already knows the destination MAC address so it can suppress the arp packet, basically no flooding happens towards other switches or in your words no flooding towards other PEs. This is the process when ARP suppression is used. ARP suppression is an enhancement provided by the MP-BGP EVPN control plane to reduce network flooding caused by broadcast traffic from ARP. Hope this helps.

Let me know if this is still not clear.

@@emergingtechbytes thanks a lot .. i got it. I really appreciate your timely responses, it helped me a lot.

Thank you for comment and glad that you found the video useful. Ah ok, not sure if you recall the timestamp where I said port number rather than a protocol field, if you recall, let me know. But you are right, ports numbers are at transport layer...

​@@emergingtechbytes it's at 41:40 - 42:00.

Hi, thanks for your query. Transport label is basically a MPLS label used for hop by hop switching in a MPLS network. Hope this helps and Happy Learning!!!

Thanks for the comment, glad that you found the content useful. Unfortunately at this time I was learning video editing, in fact still learning it. Recent videos are better, hopefully you will find them useful as well.

@@emergingtechbytes I understand. I learn a great deal about VPLS and the perspectives and examples are very helpful.

@@DrGriff2000 Great..

jefeymathew3609- thanks for the for comment. Feel free to distribute this in your circle..I will be grateful.

jefeymathew3609, Thanks for the feedback. Glad that it was useful

Thanks for the feedback Patrick. I will see what more I can do from next video onwards..

Thanks Aruran, glad to know you found this useful

Thanks, Glad to know you found this useful

Thanks for the comment. Glad to know you found this useful.

Thanks.

Thanks for the comment and glad to know you found this useful. Regarding queries: 1. Using same range is not a problem and there will be no conflict. Each LSR assign label independently. 2. Yes, LDP Assign labels to IGP based destinations 3. Yes, labels can be assigned to physical link IPs as well. Hope this helps.

Thanks Arunan for the comment, glad to know you found this useful. Can you be little more descriptive which case you are talking here. Though IGP is there, its IGP which will select the best path and LDP just provide the Label to be used for forwarding via that path. Not sure if this answer your query, if not tell me what part of the video you are talking about. Thanks

Thank you for your response. If EIGRP is being used as the IGP, will LDP distribute labels for both paths to the same destination?

@@aruranganeshan2951 np at all. yes LDP will assign labels to all IGP paths, primary or secondary. IGP will decide the best path and whatever label LDP assign for that path, that label will be used for forwarding.

Thanks for the comments, glad to know it is helping.

Thanks @aruranganeshan2951, glad to know that it was useful for you.

Thanks @JKRowl, Glad to know that it was useful for you.