วีดีโอ

Because he talks a good game but left off a lot of guys who were faster than they guys in this list. Football speed is NOT measurable. He is using his opinion at that point. Ron Brown faster than everyone on this list except Hayes. He out ran Darrell Green on the field. He has Nehemiah and James Jett on this BS list Clif Branch, Bates, and Brown were just as fast or faster than those 2 and had more production than them but he did not put them on. Why? Because when it came down to it he used his opinion. None of these opinion based lists are accurate.

None of the guys you mentioned deserve to be on the list just like most of the guys in this video don't belong on the NFL'S fastest list.

Still doesn't mean he ran the fastest.

Not in the speed dept. DJax isn't in the top 30 fastest players in NFL history.

@@sydboski yea the he'll he is bro He was the fastest in the league at one point 2010 season

@@whodatcall I can name at LEAST 30 players that would smoke DJax in a 100m. Easily! With proof. You cannot prove DJax was the fastest player in 2010 or any other year.

@sydboski desean Jackson was the ONLY player on madden 11 with 100 speed there's proof right there plus there's a video of desean jackson racing chris Johnson aka CJ2k and smoking him in the 100m look it up

@@whodatcall 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Are you serious???? Madden??? A video game is your proof for REAL LIFE? 🤣🤣🤣Stop it!🤣🤣You're killing me!!🤣🤣🤣 You cannot actually be serious about that. Those Madden speeds are NEVER right. There have been World class sprinters that have played in the NFL. None of them got a 100 speed rating in Madden. All of them were faster than DJax. Again I have proof. You have nothing. Madden....lol. Really? You've got to do MUCH better than that. As far as the race between DJax and CJ2K, it was not a 100m race. It was part of a set up relay race on the Shaquille O'Neil special. It was totally set up for Shaq to have a big lead so Tyson Gay would not zoom past him too soon. They set it up so Shaq would win in a close race. Along with some very bad acting by Tyson it worked out that way. No one in the race ran a full 100m. You need to look at the race again. This time with your eyes and mind open. You will see CJ not running hard at all. He was practically jogging. Very bad acting on his part too. Come on man you have to do better than this.

So what you are saying is a guy who runs 9.95 100m will slow down a LOT more than a guy who ran 10.08 just because they BOTH put on pads, cleats, and run on turf or grass. Or do you think that the 10.08 guy magically gets faster AFTER putting on the pads, cleats and runs on turf or grass. Which one do you think fits your illogical narrative?

@@sydboski that's exactly what I'm saying,Green was football fast.

He won the NFL fastest man contest every year he entered it,4 times

A good example was Pecy Harvin of The Florida gators..Jeff Demps was a world class sprinter on Florida.He was faster than Harvin everywhere but on the football field.

@@TeddyGant-ir1xz How do you know Harvin was faster than. Demps on the field?

So why was he outrun on the field by Ron Brown, and Michael Haynes? Also how do you measure on field speed to compare it among players not on the same field or from different eras?

@@sydboski he beat Ron brown head to head in the Nfl's Fastest man contest,there's footage of it

@@TeddyGant-ir1xz He also lost to Herschel Walker in a 100yd dash in the Superstars competition. There is footage of that too.

LMAO! Gault ran 10.10 100m and 6.18 60yd best in the NFL fastest man competition vs Rod Woodson at 10.34 and 6.25. Gault may have lost ONE race to Woodson, but Gault was definitely faster. How would you measure their on field speed to even say that Woodson was faster?

Still wouldn't be on any of my top 10 fastest lists.

@@sydboski that's your sad story

@@SamuelDavidDeLuce It's not sad and it's not a story. I go by actual measured proven speed and Dorsett is not in the top 40 fastest players ever. FACT.

​@@sydboski Bo right?

@@CountBellamarre1205 Bo is not in the top 40 fastest players ever, either.

Should be there instead of half this BS list.

Might be the fastest QB, but nowhere near fastest player.

You call this list accurate? LMAO! What makes this list accurate?

Deion 10.26 100m vs Galloway 10.35 100m reported.

@@sydboski Galloway 4.17 40 "reports". Galloway at 35 years old looking like Tyreek Hill priceless. Deion Sanders at 32 years old looking washed.

@@dcboys4195 All of those "reported " 4.1 40's are faked and fluffed. How long you hold your speed over the years does not make you faster. Plus the 40 only measures quickness and partial acceleration. The fastest players are still accelerating at the 40yd mark out to about 50m. So their top speed is not even recorded in the 40. Deion has a world athletics verified 10.26 100m dash. Galloway doesn't.

@@sydboski That's why I put reported in quotations I was being sarcastic. Terence Newman 10.2 100m was he as fast as Galloway or Sanders on a football field I don't think so. Galloway is the fastest Dallas Cowboy I have ever seen. That includes prime Deion 95-98.

@@dcboys4195 Newman ran down Randy Moss from 6yds behind. How do you know Newman wasn't as fast as Galloway or Sanders? You never saw them run together in the field. What you are using is your opinion. By measured speed, Newman was faster than both of them.

But not on this list. Deservedly so.

Hayes never ran 30mph.

Plenty of guys never caught from behind.

In the 100m Hayes ran 10.06. Players with play time Jacoby Ford 10.01 and Trindon Holliday 10.00 ran faster. 2 other players with very limited play time also ran faster. Bo Jackson's 40 time was a hand timed fluffed myth. Bo ran 6.18 55m Walker ran 6.11. Bob ran 5.9 60yd dash. 55m is 60.1yds. So you'd be wrong about them being quicker than Hayes.

​@@sydboski😮 yeah but how fast do you really believe Bo was at his peak? My brother saw him being timed in the minors and he swears he saw that dirt rise up behind him like no other.

@@CountBellamarre1205 Bo ran 10.44 at his fastest in college when he was actually training to sprint. That would rank him outside the top 60.

@@sydboski Thanks for your replies really appreciate them but how fast do you believe he was capable of running the 40 and thanks in advance.

Bo and Deion do not deserve to be on this list.

There are no Lions in the top 20 fastest players in NFL history.

You saw Walker beat Green in the Superstars competition 100 yd dash. Green beat HW in the NFL fastest man competition. Green never lost a race in the NFL'S fastest man competition. Green also has a PB of 10.08 in the 100m vs HW at 10.23.

Brown yes Epps not so. What measurement are you using?

@@sydboski Epps held the world record in the 60 at that time. Not a record that is spoken about much.

@@richardbas7574 It was the 55m 6.08, but it was never ratified and it was less than a month. Epps 100m best was 10.24 Brown when 10.06.

@@sydboski sounds about right. No question Ron Brown top 2 or 3 fastest to ever play the game. But the 40, 60 meter speed is more important in the NFL. Epps right up there.

@@richardbas7574 It's not about what is important in the NFL. It's about who runs the fastest. The fastest guys are not at top speed until about 50m out. How fast you are includes top speed and how long you can hold top speed. The 40 does not measure the top speed of the fastest players, and the 60 ends before you can show how long you can hold top speed. There is a reason why the fastest person in the world is determined by the 100m. Because it has all the elements of one's overall speed. That said, Brown is tied for 5th in the 100m all time in NFL History.

While this list sucks, DJax is not top 10 fastest on any list.

@@sydboski so the guy with one of the fastest mph touchdowns in nfl history, so the guy who ran a 4.35 on a sprained ankle, so the guy who has the 4th most fastest 100 meter time out of any nfl player in history, so the guy with the most 50 and 60 plus touchdowns, so the guy who burned Chris Johnson (4.24) in a race isn’t top 10????

@@Lefthook-poweroff The MPH stat is a joke. Plus it only started 8 years ago. There is another 100 years of football that did not record MPH. So that 100 years is nothing? The 40 does not determine who runs faster. It only measures quickness and partial acceleration. The fastest players don't reach top speed until about 50m out. They are still accelerating at the 40yd mark. So the 40 cannot possibly determine who is faster especially if they are not even running their fastest. 4.35 is good but there are plenty who've run quicker. In the 100m DJax ran a reported 10.50. 10.50 is nowhere near the top 40 fastest 100m by players in NFL history, let alone the 4th fastest. I really do not know where you got that information from, but it is 100% incorrect. The race was faked. It was not a real race. They set it up so that Shaq would have a big enough lead so Tyson Gay would look like he couldn't catch Shaq. Totally staged race. Nothing real about it. Not even Tyson's acting skills at the end. Football stats do not prove who runs faster. Sooo, yes DJax is not top 10 fast.

By what statistics?

@@sydboski A stop watch.

@@MangrovesToMountainsOutdoors Then that would not be true. 4 player ran faster 100m than Hayes. Hayes 10.06 Jacoby Ford 10.01 Jeff Demps 10.01 Trindon Holliday 10.00 Jim Hines 9.95.

How fast did he run?

Fast, but just regular guy fast. He was not a world class sprinter. Even if he was world class for his era, he wouldn't keep up with the guys who came later.

Neither time is legal or official

@@sydboski here you come, man you must have every video about fast players saved and check the comments on all of them every 2 hours. Yes I’m aware that it’s not on your Google 100m list and therefore is absolutely meaningless in your eyes, and since 100yd hasn’t been an official event for a long time it’s impossible for it to be legal or official, but Galloway’s 9.2 was on video, so it was at least documented, which is a lot more evidence than we get for supposed times people ran. And since Walker beat Green with a 9.37 at the same event, I feel a 9.2 is impressive, I doubt anyone has ever ran faster at the event. My only point was that when you start a list off by pointing out that you’re leaving a guy who ran a 9.2 off, and then you proceed to put a guy on it and base doing so off a claimed 9.7, it’s not a serious list.

@@GideonHawk-j8i 1. No, I do not. But I do like discussions about the topic. 2. It is not a Google list. I did the research myself. I have over 100 players and their official times on that list. I also have the 100yd dash and 55m times from real track meets. 3. It is not my fault you believe a guy who's best 100m time was 10.90, he stopped running track for 9 years to play college and pro football, then comes back to track and is now running world class times. It is not logical, and common sense should have told you, something is wrong. But hey you're going to believe what you want to believe. 4. I guess you are going to believe Terrell Owens ran 9.02 and Tiki Barber ran 9.14 during the same Superstars competition in 2001? LMAO! If you are going to put stock in the Superstars times, then you should do it across the board. Lol. 5. I agree with your last point. It is not a serious list based on actual measured speed. But maybe use players with more credible times like Cliff Branch 9.2/10.00 100m, Mel Gray 9.2, Issac Curtis 9.3, Travis Williams 9.3, Herschel Walker 9.3 (yes Walker did run a legit 9.3 in a real meet). He has Renaldo Nehemiah 10.24 and Sanders 10.26 100m best, but doesn't have Branch 10.00h. Mark Duper 10.20, Charles and Walker 10.23, Terence Newman 10.20, Michael Bates 10.17, Janes Trapp 10.14, Curtis Dickey 10.11, or Ron Brown 10.06. So we both can see this list is BS.

@@sydboski I’m well aware of your list and how you operate. I’ll just say this, Dan O’ Brien was also in the same race, he ran a 10.32 100m in the 96 Olympics, and Galloway smoked him, he ran a 9.56, so, while I know you think that whatever 100m time someone has on record, regardless if it was in high school, means that was the absolute fastest they could ever run and is the only metric that should matter in the discussion, I prefer to have a more nuanced take, and when I watch a guy dust someone who ran a 10.32, I’m going to come to the conclusion that the 10.9 he ran as a teenager might have not been the best he was ever capable of. To me that’s logic and common sense.

@@GideonHawk-j8i When you practice something you get better at it. Correct? When you stop, are you now getting better at it? No. Tell me how you get to a world class level in sprinting when you have not trained to do so? Dan Obrien was complaining the whole time about Galloway's false start. All the way down the track. He wasn't running all out. There is a picture of the event on the Superstars site in the 1999 men's final with Obrien with his hands out to his sides like what is going on? you can see he is not giving it his all. So Galloway DID NOT beat a Dan Obrien while he was giving 100% effort. No, you don't know what I think, and I never said what ever time they have on record means it is the absolute fastest they could ever run. Now you are trying to put words in my mouth. A some can get a little faster as the get older. But that depends on how much training and development they got at the beginning. Still if you were not world class then, You will not develop into world class status with out the continued training. I use the 100 because it has all of the aspects of one's speed; Start/quickness, acceleration, top speed, and speed endurance. None of the other distances have all of the components. I like how you only reply to certain points an leave other out completely. Funny you conveniently left out #4. What happened to that?

Even though there are 4 players who actually ran faster.

How do you measure game time speed to compare it to ppl players not on the same field or from different eras?

The split was closer to 8.9-9.0 when broken down frame by frame.