- 2
- 22 922
Bierre Poulez
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 6 พ.ค. 2020
Classical music, score following.
J.Brahms -Vier Gesänge op.17
Performers: Monteverdi choir (female section), Anneke Scott, Nuala Hebert, J.E.Gardiner.
This work has the paradoxical distinction of both the beginning of the excellent series of secular part songs that Brahms wrote, but is also unique within this output. Written for three-part women’s chorus throughout (except for a short four-part a cappella passage in the middle section of No. 4), this Op. 17 stands out because of the exceedingly romantic combination of two horns and harp set as an accompaniment. The harp was an instrument to which Brahms would rarely again turn (only in the German Requiem, Op. 45 and in the Nänie, Op. 82, and in none of the symphonies). Brahms remarked himself that he was not so fond of the instrument, since his role in the orchestra is to “make an effect.” In contrast, he always wrote effectively for horns, despite refusing to compose for the new valve instrument. The highly diverse texts lend themselves well to this combination. The choral writing is relatively simple, since multi-voice counterpoint is kept at a minimum: the three parts sing mostly in block harmonies. The one notable passage of counterpoint is at the end of each verse in No. 3. The songs were among several works for women’s chorus written around this time, including the Ave Maria, Op. 12, the Three Sacred Choruses, Op. 37, the setting of the 13th Psalm, Op. 27, and the somewhat later and less substantial Twelve Songs and Romances, Op. 44. These works owe their existence to Brahms’s directorship of the Hamburg Women’s Choir. No. 2 is Brahms’s only setting of Shakespeare (in Schlegel’s translation) other than the unpublished and rather minor “Ophelia” songs.
This work has the paradoxical distinction of both the beginning of the excellent series of secular part songs that Brahms wrote, but is also unique within this output. Written for three-part women’s chorus throughout (except for a short four-part a cappella passage in the middle section of No. 4), this Op. 17 stands out because of the exceedingly romantic combination of two horns and harp set as an accompaniment. The harp was an instrument to which Brahms would rarely again turn (only in the German Requiem, Op. 45 and in the Nänie, Op. 82, and in none of the symphonies). Brahms remarked himself that he was not so fond of the instrument, since his role in the orchestra is to “make an effect.” In contrast, he always wrote effectively for horns, despite refusing to compose for the new valve instrument. The highly diverse texts lend themselves well to this combination. The choral writing is relatively simple, since multi-voice counterpoint is kept at a minimum: the three parts sing mostly in block harmonies. The one notable passage of counterpoint is at the end of each verse in No. 3. The songs were among several works for women’s chorus written around this time, including the Ave Maria, Op. 12, the Three Sacred Choruses, Op. 37, the setting of the 13th Psalm, Op. 27, and the somewhat later and less substantial Twelve Songs and Romances, Op. 44. These works owe their existence to Brahms’s directorship of the Hamburg Women’s Choir. No. 2 is Brahms’s only setting of Shakespeare (in Schlegel’s translation) other than the unpublished and rather minor “Ophelia” songs.
มุมมอง: 7 239
วีดีโอ
A.Webern - Drei Lieder op. 18
มุมมอง 16K4 ปีที่แล้ว
Anton von Webern: 1883 - 1945 Performers: Christiane Oelze, Ensemble Intercontemporain, Pierre Boulez. Three Songs for guitar, e-flat clarinet and soprano (1925). I - 00:11 II - 01:13 III - 02:33 Schoenberg invents the 12-tone technique in 1921, and was taken very early on by his pupil Anton Webern, whose song “Mein Weg geht jetzt vorüber”, from his 5 Geistliche Lieder op.15 (1922), would alrea...
To me it was not a good decision to have the guitar so far away from the centre of the mix.
Interesting. A shame that the notes sung below the stave -such as middle C - seemed much quieter than the high notes. And the guitar is the underdog beneath top dog Clarinet. Otherwise, an admirable performance.
The piece is nearly impossible to play as written. It demands a coloratura soprano, yet dips below the normal range for such a voice type, and there is an obvious acoustic imbalance between the three instruments that is extremely difficult to overcome in a performance. While I hugely admire this composition, Webern displays equal parts inexperience and utopian fantasy in its elaboration.
Espantoso. Felicitacines al silencio posterior a ultima nota.
Fazendo a lição tbm?
De artes aff
Fabulous.
The best possible interpretation of the songs ... for several reasons. I love it!
Bierre Poulez … ha ha ! Good one
One of my favorites - what a magnificent mix of voices and instruments.
Astonishing.
the vocal range and dexterity demanded is ridiculous the sentiment of the text Webern sets does not come through to me at all through the music. I like other compositions by Webern though...
The guitar is playing way to softly. Most of the time it is marked the same dynamic as the clarinet
These are just horrible. I mean vocally. They're not expressive. All one can do is shriek.
The singer is clearly singing here, no shrieking.
Christiane Oelze is world class. Reminds on Margaret Price in her increabible Altenberg Lieder by Berg, conducted by Abbado.
This must've sounded to people in 1925 what Ferneyhough sounds like to us now. Such a great and unique piece!
it's crazy what he was able to do a hundred years ago, and to this day people find it indigestible
Beautiful! Webern: economy, and extreme concentration, among other things. So much music condensed in only a little over three minutes!
Music, you say? : D
Eyyy
Love watching your videos! Keep it up!