River Of Life Fellowship Church
River Of Life Fellowship Church
  • 440
  • 55 956

วีดีโอ

Rise Up 2024 Your Responsibility To God
มุมมอง 164 หลายเดือนก่อน
Rise Up 2024 Your Responsibility To God
Rise Up 2024 Your Responsibility to the Church
มุมมอง 194 หลายเดือนก่อน
Rise Up 2024 Your Responsibility to the Church
Rise Up 2024 Your Responsibility to Unbelievers
มุมมอง 214 หลายเดือนก่อน
Rise Up 2024 Your Responsibility to Unbelievers
Rise up 2024 Your responsibility to others
มุมมอง 284 หลายเดือนก่อน
Rise up 2024 Your responsibility to others
Rise Up 2024 Our Responsibility to Scripture
มุมมอง 154 หลายเดือนก่อน
Rise Up 2024 Our Responsibility to Scripture
Kids program Feb 2 / 2024
มุมมอง 1277 หลายเดือนก่อน
Kids program Feb 2 / 2024
Looking Forward and Asking Questions
มุมมอง 908 หลายเดือนก่อน
Looking Forward and Asking Questions
Ladies Breakfast 12 2 23 Kristy Sullivan
มุมมอง 1149 หลายเดือนก่อน
Ladies Breakfast 12 2 23 Kristy Sullivan
Ladies Breakfast 11 4 23 Denise Rivers
มุมมอง 5510 หลายเดือนก่อน
Ladies Breakfast 11 4 23 Denise Rivers
Ladies Breakfast 10-7-23 with guest speaker Janeigh Roberts
มุมมอง 6411 หลายเดือนก่อน
Ladies Breakfast 10-7-23 with guest speaker Janeigh Roberts
Marriage and Family Part 2
มุมมอง 4211 หลายเดือนก่อน
Marriage and Family Part 2
Marriage and Family Session #1
มุมมอง 6511 หลายเดือนก่อน
Marriage and Family Session #1
Joe Roberts Mens Breakfast
มุมมอง 135ปีที่แล้ว
Joe Roberts Mens Breakfast
Ladies Breakfast 5 6 23 Nancy Smith
มุมมอง 76ปีที่แล้ว
Ladies Breakfast 5 6 23 Nancy Smith
Kid's 1st Music Program
มุมมอง 112ปีที่แล้ว
Kid's 1st Music Program
Ladies Breakfast 3 11 2023, Jill Micek
มุมมอง 120ปีที่แล้ว
Ladies Breakfast 3 11 2023, Jill Micek
W.O.W. Group Promo Video
มุมมอง 65ปีที่แล้ว
W.O.W. Group Promo Video
Ladies Breakfast 2-4 -23
มุมมอง 41ปีที่แล้ว
Ladies Breakfast 2-4 -23
Ladies Breakfast 12-3-22 Ruth Yancey
มุมมอง 172ปีที่แล้ว
Ladies Breakfast 12-3-22 Ruth Yancey
Ladies Breakfast 11-5-22 Pat Eddy
มุมมอง 47ปีที่แล้ว
Ladies Breakfast 11-5-22 Pat Eddy
Dr. Jason Lisle: Ultimate Proof of Creation
มุมมอง 18Kปีที่แล้ว
Dr. Jason Lisle: Ultimate Proof of Creation
Dr. Jason Lisle: The Secret Code of Creation
มุมมอง 1.5Kปีที่แล้ว
Dr. Jason Lisle: The Secret Code of Creation
Dr. Jason Lisle: Understanding Genesis
มุมมอง 4.2Kปีที่แล้ว
Dr. Jason Lisle: Understanding Genesis
Biblical Stewardship Pt 4
มุมมอง 322 ปีที่แล้ว
Biblical Stewardship Pt 4
Kids Church Lessons 169
มุมมอง 112 ปีที่แล้ว
Kids Church Lessons 169
Kids Church Lessons 167
มุมมอง 142 ปีที่แล้ว
Kids Church Lessons 167
Kids Church Lessons 168
มุมมอง 52 ปีที่แล้ว
Kids Church Lessons 168

ความคิดเห็น

  • @barryredman2803
    @barryredman2803 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    When you're looking infinity in the face.

  • @nicolebraun3006
    @nicolebraun3006 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Could you repost this video with proper sound? It’s way too important to miss.

    • @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388
      @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hello there. Unfortunately, that was the best audio we could get for that talk. However, Dr. Lisle is returning this October, and we will livestream the event. It will be October 12th from 6:30 - 9 / the 13th from 10-11:30 and again that night from 5;30 to 9 with a Q&A at the end. Online participants will be able to ask questions in the comments as well.

  • @haggismcbaggis9485
    @haggismcbaggis9485 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This guy sucks at science.

  • @tackytrout2925
    @tackytrout2925 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I find this man to be fascinating. Unfortunately, at the beginning when he is trying to make an argument that no new Comets are being formed is a strange argument. I summarizing. But that is his believe. Seems impossibly illogical. Especially since we only live 70-85 years on average. Makes no sense. He makes brilliant points as well, but is clouded by scripture.

  • @vhawk1951kl
    @vhawk1951kl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lisle is plainly autistic but does not look Jewish; does anyone know if i he is a blood Jew or a religious Jew On any view the poor creature is bigot of the first water.

    • @timber2lease
      @timber2lease หลายเดือนก่อน

      so being autitistic is a jewish trait?

  • @vhawk1951kl
    @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is the magic in the jewbook or Torah of which genesis is the first book and why does the Lisle loon not adopt Judaism if he supposes the first book of the foundational document of that religion which has*fcuk_nothing* to do with christianity, to be magic and special?If genesis - the jewbook is so magic, why not become a Judaist or Jew little loon?

  • @vhawk1951kl
    @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bible simply means book. Which " book is " true and in what sense can an object-specifically a book, admit of truth or falsehood. Is there something magic or special about we Jews that you suppose or book to be magic? *Why* suppose that our Jewbook is magic?

    • @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388
      @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello there. Based on your comment, I assume that you are Jewish. Is that true? If that is the case, I would have a couple of questions about your "magic" comment. At what point did Dr. Lisle use the term magic or assume the idea of magic in this talk? At the same time, the idea of a material object admitting truth is an odd way of putting it. A book cannot admit anything as it is simply paper and ink. However, the material within the pager can convey truth as well as make truth claims. The question is in the evidence presented. Do you have a specific question regarding that evidence or any of the claims made within this particular talk?

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@riveroflifefellowshipchurc388 One is jrwish for the purposes of the German extermination laws if one has any Jewish ancestors, and given that my great grandmothere was Jewish that would qualify me for the gas chamber. I'ts a blood thing. there are plenty of Jews(if not most of us) that are atheists. whst some call the ild testament i consists mostly of writings of rabbis- which have fcuk nothing to do with Brian/jesus although some of the more insane literalist bigots seem to suppose that supposing that the jewbook is authoritative depite the fact that has fcuk_Nothing* to do wirh Brian. For fcuk'sake *why*suppoe thejewbook which some loons call bible(which simply means book)which was written by Jewish rabbis to have some magic to it o or be somehow special when all it is is just another fcuking book like all an any other books.. There are plenty of other books as unrelated to brianas judaism is, for example the Upanisgdads; why not tack the jesussey onto them? why are only Hebrew words the words of mister god What makes you loons suppose that *any* words in*any book(collection of words are the words of mister god. Presumably you accept that most of what you call the old testament is jewish/hebrew/Israelite in origin. Why do words become " mister god'swords just because the happen to have been written by jaws?If I a jew write a bok will you literal loons and your fancy bigots start saying that it is the words of mister god?Why not? I t would have many of the same characteristics as the jewbook/bible which is magic or special because.....................? What exactly*Is* it about our jewbook/ the book.bible that makes it specially true or magic? why are *some* words *mistergod's* words and not others? What exactly is it about some words or books/colections of words that enable some loons and bigots to declare "Ah, *these* words are mister god's words? Come on why are *some* words mister god's* words and not others? You have not the faintest idea have you? you can say, I know.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@riveroflifefellowshipchurc388 No doubt you noticed that the speaker, who could not possibly have a PhD from any university worthy of the name calls his feeble effort” Ultimate Proof of Creation”, but does not trouble himself to set out what that might possibly *mean*, nor does he define his terms, set out what he means by either “ creation", nor what in his infantile and trembling submission might constitute "proof". I’m afraid he comes across like a fifteen year-old boy talking to himself wherein he advances no clear proposition but merely makes bare assertions in a manner that can only be described as infantile and incoherent. If the creature had the wits of which it is clearly bereft it would have run that drivel past a grown up before leaving its bloody body on the doorstep of the world; it is a complete abortion and little more than drivel and is painful to watch. Quite of what the miserable creature is so terrified, who can tell, but he stammers out his stuttering orison as if he were about to be executed, and makes asinine references to something he calls god which seems to be some idol he h has in his dreaming apparatus or mind. My original question or point is why he treats the book of a religion to which he does not subscribe as if it were in some way special or magic, and if he supposes what I call the jewbook and he calls bible or book as if it had special properties or magic. It is a term of art when one encounters one that refers to some thing as if it were in some way special or had special properties to enquire what is “ the magic “ in whatever that may be, and one wonders does not the poor creature that clings onto what he calls “ the bible “ as if he were drowning in a storm consists mostly of what is called the old testament onto which(for no apparent reason) is tacked what I call the jesussey-the tale of some fellow called jesus that has *fckuk_nothing* to do with greater part of what is no more than just another book, which, being no more than an object cannot admit of truth or falsehood and is thus to say the bible/jewbook is “ true” is simply asinine. In sum the whole feeble effort is an abortion that proves nothing and should be taken down to save the poor cretin responsible for it from further embarrassment; if it were a horse I would shoot it out of kindness to put it out of its misery. It takes breathtaking stupidity to entitle an abortion like that the *“ultimate proof”* of anything. The creature is clearly an halfwit if it does not have the wits and sense to take down that abortion, which is the only word apt for that asinine and infantile drivel. It clearly lacks the wits to understand the different forms what it calls “ proof” and does not take the trouble set out exactly what he says proves what and how, but bleats about something he calls” god -whatever the fcuk that might be. The poor creature reminds me of the baby barrister defending in a case which I was prosecuting what is now forty years ago and making a complete horlicks of it, that make to me while I was having a quick cigarette during a short adjournment and said : “ what should I do?” and although the Bar is a kind profession that tries to be gentle with its babies, all I could say to the poor creature was :” Something else dear boy, something else, meaning the Bar is not for you, because he was like the Lisle creature completely inept. If you know the fellow and like the poor fool tell him to take down that drivel, because it really is ghastly and does him no favours and if I were to guess, that of which he is plainly terrified-and rightly, is his sense of with_ knowledge or truth which is silently yelling him that the pathetic effort is a complete abortion which - as you well know, it..... is. it really is..... .... ... *Awful*, but the better word is ghastly, although another word is embarrassing, as anyone with wits learning and breeding would tell you. What the fcuk is " creation" supposed to be and how can it be *" proved"*? One thing is certain, anyone seeking answers to those questions will not find them it that complete abortion, which is the - dare I say?- " ultimate" example of asinine and infantile complete drivel, that " *"proves"* nothing and boils down to little more than please-don't-hit-me-mister As the saying goes: " If , at, first, you don't succeed, skydiving is most definitely*Not* for you - tell the poor fool to take.... it.... ...... *Down*.If only out of merciful kindness, and we'll say no more about and forget the whole thing and pretend it never existed - also out of simple kindness. fair enough?

  • @joshuamartin1999
    @joshuamartin1999 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude is turning 50 this year and still looks 35. Thank you Dr. Lisle!

    • @ksbrst2010
      @ksbrst2010 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well zhis explains that his Argumentation is centuries old. You don't play dice with Eucaryotes all their dice are loaded. The combinationof genetic drift wirh the ancient Selektion of Darwin makes them unbeatable which is known in biology for more than 50 years but creationists simply can't handle the math.

  • @joshuamartin1999
    @joshuamartin1999 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dr. Lisle, what denomination are you? Thank you for all you do!

  • @guycohen4419
    @guycohen4419 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You say the Word of God is the ultimate authority and everything else must go through the filter of comparison to what is says but I just wonder - If that is truly what you believe, why do you observe the first day of the week (Sunday) instead of the 7th day of the week which is the TRUE Sabbath? Do you not believe what God said? Isaiah 66. Exodus 20. Ezekiel 45. The Sabbath is NOT done away with, and Yeshua never changed it to Sunday. For such an intelligent guy you are not very bright.

    • @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388
      @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Greetings. This page is not run by Dr Lisle, but as pastor of the church, I can respond to your comment. It is sad that you feel the need to be this critical of such an accomplished man serving the message of the Gospel based on such an insignificant argument. You seem to base someone's faith and commitment to the Word of God around a day of the week and not the fruit of their life. If the day on which we honor the Sabbath is that important, then let's examine your argument. Let's examine a few things to see if you actually understand the depth of your own argument and see if it holds up to a small amount of scrutiny. First: if you are assuming that the day of the week we labeled Saturday is the only acceptable day to be used as the sabbath, I would ask you if you are using the calendar dating system of the pre-captivity pre-roman Jewish nation. I would also remind you that during that time, they cannot account for around 350 years of their own history. Meaning that they are no longer certain what day of the week the sabbath was originally on. This forced them to adapt, meaning they just picked a day that seemed right. According to you, this would mean that from that point on, any jew that honored the sabbath on the wrong day was no longer pleasing to God. Apparently, in your view, the day itself is more important than the practice. Then, the Romans took control and implemented their own calendar; after that was another calendar, and then finally, the current Gregorian calendar structure we use today was put in place. On that Calendar, Sunday is the last day of the week. So I have to ask: should it be the last day or the second to last day that we honor the Sabbath? At the same time, if you reject the standard calendar structures, are you telling me that you have correctly tracked back all of the days in history to the exact 7th day of creation when the original sabbath day occurred? I seriously doubt it. Today, no matter if you are honoring the sabbath on Saturday or Sunday, you are using a day that was simply picked out by the originators of the denomination you follow based on the calendar structure they have chosen to use. More than anything, this shows us that the day itself is irrelevant; it is the practice that matters. Men judge the actions of other men, but God judges the heart. Second: let's talk about the practice. Do you honor only the day of the week or the regulations that come with it? Do you travel more than 1 mile away from your home on the Sabbath? Remember that driving counts because to drive, you have to "burn fuel, and igniting it is prohibited on the Sabbath. Do you or anyone else in your home do any housework, yard work, or physical exertion of any kind on the Sabbath? If you are married, do you allow your spouse to cook for you on the sabbath, or do you make sure that they prepare Saturday's food on Friday before sundown? I think we both know the answer to these is no. I would suggest that instead of condemning people you don't know and have never met as ungodly or intelligent about their faith, you should spend more time learning the important things like grace, kindness, living without the need to judge others, not seeing yourself more highly than you should. Try to remember that above all we lead people to faith in Christ, not faith in a day of the week. Galatians 4:9-11 (NKJV)9 But now after you have known God, or rather are known by God, how is it that you turn again to the weak and beggarly elements, to which you desire again to be in bondage? 10 You observe days and months and seasons and years. 11 I am afraid for you, lest I have labored for you in vain.

    • @guycohen4419
      @guycohen4419 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@riveroflifefellowshipchurc388 this message was intended for Jason Lisle, not for you. Apparently, you do not possess the wisdom and discernment that Dr. Lisle has. You have revealed to me in the first couple lines that you do not understand the message. To your point however - it seems you are unaware of the origin of the Sunday worship, which is very sad for a pastor, a religious leader of a congregation. Sure, we lost track of the original, however, the JEWS were the ones given the Torah, and they are the ones who have been practicing the Faith for thousands of years. Not you gentiles who do not understand what you believe. There is no such thing as "Christianity". Christ is Messiah which means Meshiach or anointed one which is a Hebrrew word from the Torah - the book given to the JEWS. Yeshua said FOLLOW ME AND LIVE AS I LIVED. You do not. He did not do what you do, and you do not do what He did. Keep the Shabbat - the day the Lord commanded. not the day of the Roman sun god. Very sad for your congregation. Pass this along to Jason Lisle and let him respond.

    • @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388
      @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@guycohen4419 Interesting, sad, and predictable. I'm sorry if a logical answer was more than you were expecting. So, just to be clear, because I do not worship on the day you think I should, apparently, I am not a believer. How gracious of you. Yet you admit that you don't actually know when the true Sabbath was or is. In Genesis, it is simply called the seventh day. Outside of accusations that have nothing to do with faith in Christ, and a severe lack of grace toward other believers, do have any actual proof of your claim? Can you show me in scripture where the modern Saturday is the only day when true believers can worship or that those who worship on other days are reprobate? Can you answer my questions on whether you adhere to the behavioral laws pertaining to the Sabbath, or do you just use this as a baseless argument to make yourself feel better by running other believers down for no good reason? Can you show me in the pages of scripture where "Christianity" is not valid? You can claim that it was the Jews who were given the Torah, no one rejects that, but they failed to follow it over and over to the point of not even recognizing their own Messiah. You can reject the Message of Christ and the fulfillment of the law; that's on you. You can stomp your feet and yell about what day the Sabbath is on; that's on you. But, I am not subject to you, or your graceless application of faith. I follow Christ and the teachings of scripture. Those beliefs begin with understanding humility, grace, and forgiveness. My prayer is that you eventually step away from whatever is in you that makes you so hostile toward Christianity. Even if you were to put forward a good argument, which this is not, no one is going to turn and follow insults, arrogance, and pride. If you have an actual point of reference that you would like to honestly discuss, I am open, but this kind of hate-filled back and forth does nothing but divide.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Really who decides what is and is not whatever-you-mean-by-but-have-not- the-faintest-idea " the word of god", and what the fcuk is whatever-you-mean-by-but-have-not- the-faintest-idea " god"? You have not the faintest idea on either score? That, sunshine, you are about to demonstrate

  • @walkergarya
    @walkergarya 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The men who wrote the bible had no concept that dinosaurs ever existed. Jason Lisle is a fraud, a Young Earth Creationist who uses his science education to baffle gab to unthinking sheeple.

  • @ermasale4618
    @ermasale4618 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you the actions of God on day 4 of Genesis Bring about the Cambrian explosion in THE Geological timescale of the planet earth?

  • @ermasale4618
    @ermasale4618 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Job 38 within the chapter I find STOREHOUSE of hail we call asteroid belt. I also find STOREHOUSE of snow. We call KUIPER BELT and ort cloud. Also I find detailed Description of dirty snowball we call the comet. I also find the sound of heavens and stars heard by scribe Job 38:7. We hear sounds from planets and the sounds from the material cosmos we call heavens. Job 38:4, where was thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? Job 38:4,7, brings me to realize earth was not the first item formed. Genesis 1:5, says the earth was empty and void meaning it was made later. The sun and moon created on day 4 of Genesis is apparently the sun and moon in our solar system. Day 4 of Genesis describes earth in our solar system. Thank you for your time.

    • @ermasale4618
      @ermasale4618 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I also find a connection between The Cambrian explosion and the Day 4 of Genesis I now ask you is it possible for creation of our solar system An creation of solar system Sun and Moon upon the day 4 Of the BIBLICAL account

  • @ermasale4618
    @ermasale4618 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is chapter 38 Job example of divine revelatio Thank you

    • @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388
      @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Greetings, thank you for the question. In order to answer, I'm going to need a bit more information. The context of Job 38 runs through 39 and into verses 1&2 of 40, so it is pretty extensive. Are you wondering if the proclamations being made by God in terms of His role and power in creation are revelation themselves, or if the statements themselves are a kind of revelation, or something different? Just want to make sure I am answering the right question. Blessings.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rather an example of divine hostility if anything

  • @davidboswell5485
    @davidboswell5485 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why does everyone believe what they want to believe and live their lives either the way they want or the way they believe God would want them to? It is not for the common man to judge the life of another. For me that is only deemed for God. People can say this is bad if this is wrong due to whatever. They may believe the are born, they live, they die, and that’s it. Other believe added in they are saved and will go to heaven. Others believe they are reincarnated. Why can’t these people be allowed to believe what they want and not have anything forced upon them. When this doesn’t happen, as in history, millions of people are murdered in the name of this or that. Imprisoned forever because they don’t believe what tyrants believe. For me, Gods gave us free will to do as we see fit. Some follow some of the Bible, but I have never met someone who honestly follows every word of the Bible or Christs teachings. Regardless in my heart I believe what I believe. I will let no one sway me one way or another in my beliefs. But I cannot condemn anyone for their religion, that is for God to determine.

    • @alantasman8273
      @alantasman8273 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why did Jesus tell us to preach the Gospel to the world? Why should Christians not be concerned about people losing their souls having been blinded by a secular world's propaganda? Should Christians remain silent about the Good News and just let people go to hell... a place of eternal torment? Is this what Jesus meant when He told us to love one another?

  • @davidboswell5485
    @davidboswell5485 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hang in a sec. The new James Webb telescope can see 3.8 billion light years away. Is that not in the realm of see the cloud?

    • @alantasman8273
      @alantasman8273 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually the James Webb telescope has seen twice as far away in time as when the Big Bang supposedly happened...putting the lie to the Big Bang. theory.

  • @dodo1opps
    @dodo1opps 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Opinion...opinion...opinion...

    • @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388
      @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Other than your opinion… opinion… opinion, do you have a logical or scientific issue with the material presented that you would like to discuss?

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      repeating the word opinion, achieves precisely what, or is intended to achieve precisely what? The breathtakingly stupid title claiming to an "ultimate" proof" of something "*proves*" absolutely nothing, the author being what the charitable might call semantically challenged or the less charitable an halfwit.

  • @DavidLambert1969
    @DavidLambert1969 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not convincing. Unless you’ve already decided it’s what you believe…

    • @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388
      @riveroflifefellowshipchurc388 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interesting observation, but the same could be said for any argument, including atheism. Is there a logical or scientific objection to the material presented that you would like to discuss?

  • @kellyjohns6612
    @kellyjohns6612 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These younger Christian scientists like Jason, Mondo and a few others are becoming my version of rockstars. I idolize nothing, but I find the minds of these people most impressive and makes me want to know everything good that I'm currently unaware of. Fifty-six and still a child in school 😁

  • @jlcraw79
    @jlcraw79 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So thankful for this.

    • @jlcraw79
      @jlcraw79 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@southernsal3113 watch it and you will see. Otherwise move on.

  • @kristysullivan9540
    @kristysullivan9540 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Denise!! Sorry I wasn’t there in person.

  • @user-uh8ub1yj4n
    @user-uh8ub1yj4n 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bravo! Something we all need to be reminded of. Convicting to say the least.

  • @jamesfreeman2253
    @jamesfreeman2253 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Ye shall know truth, and truth shall set you free"~ Jesus John 8:32 In a world that lies to us on everything possible, I will hold my truth from truth its self,jesus my savior, the worlds truth. And so I pray, father of truth, master of my heart, ring your will through the land, that all decived by this world open there eyes to see, and ears to hear! Let deception fall on its face, and you bring your light to every heart , let not one be lost. As a sweeping rain, let your word ring true to all hearts, braking stones, and preparing the kingdom to come. I pray, Lord my God, you be with the faithless as much as those in faith. Let us strengthen as your image,as a whole, and not be divided from truth, your truth! In Jesus' name, I pray amen!!!!!!!!!!! We all search for truth,happiness, purpose, and meaning. I have learned this is all obtainable, but like a light switch can turn off that easily. With jesus, it has sustained all these things in every aspect of my life. Now I strive to be holy every which way I can. True power and the meaning is yawhey!

  • @user-uh8ub1yj4n
    @user-uh8ub1yj4n 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lol that's what got the world into the trouble that it's in now. Everyone wants to live by their own truth. But we as God's children will stand firm in the truth of God's word alone. Wonderful teaching pastor! Thank you.

  • @user-uh8ub1yj4n
    @user-uh8ub1yj4n 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amen!! Thank you pastor George for sound teaching. God bless you and Samantha. I always tell people that no matter how it works out, it will work out for God's honor and glory and for the good of those who love Him.

  • @rlunnerstall3527
    @rlunnerstall3527 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank YOU, we will forever be grateful for You and Your work. You are a Great Blessing to many.

  • @donhaddix3770
    @donhaddix3770 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pre-Adamic Creation Read more at Christian Talk Zone Pre-Adamic Creation Commentaries • Commentaries by CoreIssue When people crack open the Bible, the most common assumption accepted by Christians is that all matter and energy came into existence within the six days in chapter one of Genesis, thus meaning the earth is merely thousands of years old. The statement itself is flawed. The Bible does not state the Earth is thousands of years old. This statement comes from the assumption that the six days of creation begin at Genesis 1:1. This is incorrect. They begin at Genesis 1:3. Genesis 1:1: In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Bara' Strong's Number: 1254 Original WordWord Origin arba primitive root Transliterated WordTDNT Entry Bara'TWOT - 278 Phonetic SpellingParts of Speech baw-raw' Verb Definition 1. to create, shape, form a. (Qal) to shape, fashion, create (always with God as subject) 1. of heaven and earth 2. of individual man 3. of new conditions and circumstances 4. of transformations b. (Niphal) to be created 1. of heaven and earth 2. of birth 3. of something new 4. of miracles c. (Piel) 1. to cut down 2. to cut out 2. to be fat a. (Hiphil) to make yourselves fat The Hebrew word, bara, in Genesis 1:1, indicates that what was created was "ex-nihilo" - out of nothing. One should not confuse bara (“he created”) with its synonym `asah (“he made”). In the nothingness, there was only God. For examples of “made,” consider Exodus 20:11 and Exodus 31:17. Exodus 20:11: For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. `asah Strong's Number: 6213 Original WordWord Origin hX[a primitive root Transliterated WordTDNT Entry `asahTWOT - 1708,1709 Phonetic SpellingParts of Speech aw-saw' Verb Definition Strong's Number: 06213; TWOT: 1708,1709; verb 1. to do, fashion, accomplish, make a. (Qal) 1. to do, work, make, produce 1a b. to do 1a c. to work 1a d. to deal (with) 1a e. to act, act with effect, effect 1. to make 1a f. to make 1a g. to produce 1a h. to prepare 1a i. to make (an offering) 1a j. to attend to, put in order 1a k. to observe, celebrate 1a l. to acquire (property) 1a m. to appoint, ordain, institute 1a n. to bring about 1a o. to use 1a p. to spend, pass q. (Niphal) 1. to be done 2. to be made 3. to be produced 4. to be offered 5. to be observed 6. to be used r. (Pual) to be made 2. (Piel) to press, squeeze Therefore, there is a fundamental difference between God creating, forming, and shaping the heavens and the earth [Bara' in Genesis 1:1] compared to God making, fashioning, and working the heavens and the earth [`asah in Exodus 20:11 and Exodus 31:17]. For the definition of these words “made” and “create,” I will turn to the Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition: Made: (1): (a): FICTITIOUS, INVENTED (b): artificially produced (c): put together of various ingredients (2): assured of success 1Create: (1): to bring into existence <God created the heaven and the earth--Genesis 1:1 (AV)> (2): (a): to invest with a new form, office, or rank (b): to produce or bring about by a course of action or behavior (3): CAUSE, OCCATION (4): (a): to produce through imaginative skill (b): DESIGN ~ vi: to make or bring into existence something new" Again, notice the key difference between (made) "put together of various ingredients" verses (create) "to bring into existence." The term "made" used in the context of "create" is inaccurate, by definition. Genesis 1:1-2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. Hayah Strong's Number: 01961 Original WordWord Origin hyha primitive root [compare (01933)] Transliterated WordTDNT Entry HayahTWOT - 491 Phonetic SpellingParts of Speech haw-yaw Verb Definition to be, become, come to pass, exist, happen, fall out 1. (Qal) a. to happen, fall out, occur, take place, come about, come to pass b. to come about, come to pass c. to come into being, become d. to arise, appear, come e. to become f. to become g. to become like h. to be instituted, be established i. to be j. to exist, be in existence k. to abide, remain, continue (with word of place or time) l. to stand, lie, be in, be at, be situated (with word of locality) m. to accompany, be with 2. (Niphal) a. to occur, come to pass, be done, be brought about b. to be done, be finished, be gone Tohuw Strong's Number: 08414 Original WordWord Origin whtfrom an unused root meaning to lie waste Transliterated WordTDNT Entry TohuwTWOT - 2494a Phonetic SpellingParts of Speech to'-hoo Noun Masculine Definition 1. formlessness, confusion, unreality, emptiness a. formlessness (of primeval earth) 1. nothingness, empty space b. that which is empty or unreal (of idols) (fig) c. wasteland, wilderness (of solitary places) d. place of chaos e. vanity Bohuw Strong's Number: 0922 Original WordWord Origin whbfrom an unused root (meaning to be empty) Transliterated WordTDNT Entry BohuwTWOT - 205a Phonetic SpellingParts of Speech bo'-hoo Noun Masculine Definition 1. emptiness, void, waste T@howm Strong's Number: 08415 Original WordWord Origin ~whtfrom (01949) Transliterated WordTDNT Entry T@howmTWOT - 2495a Phonetic SpellingParts of Speech teh-home' Noun Definition 1. deep, depths, deep places, abyss, the deep, sea 1. deep (of subterranean waters) 2. deep, sea, abysses (of sea) 3. primeval ocean, deep 4. deep, depth (of river) 5. abyss, the grave God created the earth to be inhabited. Therefore, God would have created a perfect earth in Genesis 1:1. But, in Genesis 1:2, the earth was an empty, chaotic [Tohuw] wasteland [Bohuw] in water [T@howm]. This is not perfection, but the opposite.

  • @randallhatcher6028
    @randallhatcher6028 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jason Lysle your volume is too low .

  • @donhaddix3770
    @donhaddix3770 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pre-Adamic Creation Read more at Christian Talk Zone Pre-Adamic Creation Commentaries • Commentaries by CoreIssue When people crack open the Bible, the most common assumption accepted by Christians is that all matter and energy came into existence within the six days in chapter one of Genesis, thus meaning the earth is merely thousands of years old. The statement itself is flawed. The Bible does not state the Earth is thousands of years old. This statement comes from the assumption that the six days of creation begin at Genesis 1:1. This is incorrect. They begin at Genesis 1:3. Genesis 1:1: In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Bara' Strong's Number: 1254 Original WordWord Origin arba primitive root Transliterated WordTDNT Entry Bara'TWOT - 278 Phonetic SpellingParts of Speech baw-raw' Verb Definition 1. to create, shape, form a. (Qal) to shape, fashion, create (always with God as subject) 1. of heaven and earth 2. of individual man 3. of new conditions and circumstances 4. of transformations b. (Niphal) to be created 1. of heaven and earth 2. of birth 3. of something new 4. of miracles c. (Piel) 1. to cut down 2. to cut out 2. to be fat a. (Hiphil) to make yourselves fat The Hebrew word, bara, in Genesis 1:1, indicates that what was created was "ex-nihilo" - out of nothing. One should not confuse bara (“he created”) with its synonym `asah (“he made”). In the nothingness, there was only God. For examples of “made,” consider Exodus 20:11 and Exodus 31:17. Exodus 20:11: For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. `asah Strong's Number: 6213 Original WordWord Origin hX[a primitive root Transliterated WordTDNT Entry `asahTWOT - 1708,1709 Phonetic SpellingParts of Speech aw-saw' Verb Definition Strong's Number: 06213; TWOT: 1708,1709; verb 1. to do, fashion, accomplish, make a. (Qal) 1. to do, work, make, produce 1a b. to do 1a c. to work 1a d. to deal (with) 1a e. to act, act with effect, effect 1. to make 1a f. to make 1a g. to produce 1a h. to prepare 1a i. to make (an offering) 1a j. to attend to, put in order 1a k. to observe, celebrate 1a l. to acquire (property) 1a m. to appoint, ordain, institute 1a n. to bring about 1a o. to use 1a p. to spend, pass q. (Niphal) 1. to be done 2. to be made 3. to be produced 4. to be offered 5. to be observed 6. to be used r. (Pual) to be made 2. (Piel) to press, squeeze Therefore, there is a fundamental difference between God creating, forming, and shaping the heavens and the earth [Bara' in Genesis 1:1] compared to God making, fashioning, and working the heavens and the earth [`asah in Exodus 20:11 and Exodus 31:17]. For the definition of these words “made” and “create,” I will turn to the Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition: Made: (1): (a): FICTITIOUS, INVENTED (b): artificially produced (c): put together of various ingredients (2): assured of success 1Create: (1): to bring into existence <God created the heaven and the earth--Genesis 1:1 (AV)> (2): (a): to invest with a new form, office, or rank (b): to produce or bring about by a course of action or behavior (3): CAUSE, OCCATION (4): (a): to produce through imaginative skill (b): DESIGN ~ vi: to make or bring into existence something new" Again, notice the key difference between (made) "put together of various ingredients" verses (create) "to bring into existence." The term "made" used in the context of "create" is inaccurate, by definition. Genesis 1:1-2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. Hayah Strong's Number: 01961 Original WordWord Origin hyha primitive root [compare (01933)] Transliterated WordTDNT Entry HayahTWOT - 491 Phonetic SpellingParts of Speech haw-yaw Verb Definition to be, become, come to pass, exist, happen, fall out 1. (Qal) a. to happen, fall out, occur, take place, come about, come to pass b. to come about, come to pass c. to come into being, become d. to arise, appear, come e. to become f. to become g. to become like h. to be instituted, be established i. to be j. to exist, be in existence k. to abide, remain, continue (with word of place or time) l. to stand, lie, be in, be at, be situated (with word of locality) m. to accompany, be with 2. (Niphal) a. to occur, come to pass, be done, be brought about b. to be done, be finished, be gone Tohuw Strong's Number: 08414 Original WordWord Origin whtfrom an unused root meaning to lie waste Transliterated WordTDNT Entry TohuwTWOT - 2494a Phonetic SpellingParts of Speech to'-hoo Noun Masculine Definition 1. formlessness, confusion, unreality, emptiness a. formlessness (of primeval earth) 1. nothingness, empty space b. that which is empty or unreal (of idols) (fig) c. wasteland, wilderness (of solitary places) d. place of chaos e. vanity Bohuw Strong's Number: 0922 Original WordWord Origin whbfrom an unused root (meaning to be empty) Transliterated WordTDNT Entry BohuwTWOT - 205a Phonetic SpellingParts of Speech bo'-hoo Noun Masculine Definition 1. emptiness, void, waste T@howm Strong's Number: 08415 Original WordWord Origin ~whtfrom (01949) Transliterated WordTDNT Entry T@howmTWOT - 2495a Phonetic SpellingParts of Speech teh-home' Noun Definition 1. deep, depths, deep places, abyss, the deep, sea 1. deep (of subterranean waters) 2. deep, sea, abysses (of sea) 3. primeval ocean, deep 4. deep, depth (of river) 5. abyss, the grave God created the earth to be inhabited. Therefore, God would have created a perfect earth in Genesis 1:1. But, in Genesis 1:2, the earth was an empty, chaotic [Tohuw] wasteland [Bohuw] in water [T@howm]. This is not perfection, but the opposite.

  • @michaelgeorge4600
    @michaelgeorge4600 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    PRAISE AND WORSHIP BE TO OUR AWESOME GOD!

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those that abuse capital letters not only emphasise nothing but the hysteria of the abuser, they also declare the abuser to be a lunatic Abusers abuse all sorts, who or what remains to be seen or prosecuted. Why do you suppose your idol mister god to be in need of flattery and sucking up or just crawling? What - for you is so special about an obscure arb tribe that yu suppos their book to be magic? what is so special about the Jewbok oh crawling flattering sucker-up? If we jews and our book are s special why do you not doing the logical thing and convert to Judaism?

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      *Must* you crawl so and be *quite* such a grovelling sycophant? Very well your mister god is a jolly good chap and a splendid fellow, but if I were you I would lay off the idolatry because mister god would rather you were a *Man* than a crawling grovelling dog.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those that abuse capital letters not only emphasise nothing but the hysteria of the abuser, they also declare the abuser to be a lunatic Abusers abuse all sorts, who or what remains to be seen or prosecuted. *Any* kind of abuse*not* a good idea.

  • @walkergarya
    @walkergarya 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lisle is a fraud with nothing more than technobabble to spew at those who want their ignorance confirmed.

  • @randallhatcher6028
    @randallhatcher6028 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's a conflict of man's sin nature and God's holy righteous laws .

  • @tammy7724
    @tammy7724 ปีที่แล้ว

    EVILution

  • @pickupyourcross3480
    @pickupyourcross3480 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have been watching pastor George for well over a year now. I thank God for his sermons and the way God uses him to convict my heart. Even though I don’t go to that church he is still my pastor. Thank pastor George for letting God use you

  • @christophesutter1844
    @christophesutter1844 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alléluia 🔥💗🔥

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did no-one ever warn you against using those asinine infantile symbols used only by imbecile children, lest you be taken for an imbecile child, for no *sane* adult would dream of using anything so asinine and infantile, but if you sincerely*wish* to be taken for an imbecile child, that is of course entirely a matter for you. I only need to see them used to know for a certainty that the user is a child with few wits, for no adult with wits and learning would dream of using them for fear of being taken for an imbecile child, that inference being inescapable. The *only* inference that can be drawn from the use of those asinine and infantile symbols is that the user is some kind of imbecile child, for*no* adult with wits or learning would use anything to asinine and infantile, but if you active *wish* to be taken for or supposed to be an imbecile child, that is of course entirely a matter for you. here really is *no_other* inference to draw but those that use such asinine and infantile symbols *are* imbecile children, for *no* sane adult with wits and learning would dream of using anything so asinine and infantile for fear of being taken for, or supposed to be, an imbecile child. You seem to *wish* to be supposed to be an imbecile child, but if that is your wish amen to that.

  • @Simon-kt2lx
    @Simon-kt2lx ปีที่แล้ว

    I just watch a video of Dr. Jason Lisle and i think he is very good on a lot of topics but there is something about Old Earth theistic model that can still work about sin and death. I don't think its true when he said that if we believe that Earth is very old we have to believe the same as the secular scientific view about the age of the fossil. The event (flood) that make all the fossils can still be about 4 thousands years ago and after Adam sin event if the days of creation are long period of times. Before Adam, the creation can still have been harmonious for a long periods of times as God created all things that exist for its good pleasure and Man can still only have been created by God 6000 years ago.

  • @moracehann5857
    @moracehann5857 ปีที่แล้ว

    So the Gospel writers wrote about what tehy saw Jesus, the Christ perform miracles, die on a cross, according to the scriptures, was buried and rose again on the 3rd day accordibg to the scriptures.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If only you could cross-examine said gospel writers, but you cannot If it *cannot*be true, it *Is* not true.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It may be, but since whatever esoteric school that was responsible for the jesussey is now extinct, the writers cannot be cross examined for the usual purposes. It's a damn fine work of (possibly objective) art but cannot possibly constitute *Evidence * of anything save possibly thst there ws perhaps such an esoteric school. Whil it is true that something that must have been designed will bear that inference but it tells you *absolutely_nothing about the nature and identity of the designer with which yon stammering stuttering and clearly terrified puppy cannot help you. All it does is bleat abut something called " god"-whatever the fcuk that might be and something called the bible which is no more than a species of almanac of some obscure Arab tribe written by the priests of a religion onto which the puppy does not subscribe, that merely happens to have the jesussey tacked on to it seemingly as an after thought, but why, who knows?-the jesussey and the jewbook or jewsery being wholly unrelated.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ever heard of liars titch? It is not exactly unknown for men(human beings/dreaming machines to lie. If it*cannot_ possibly* be true, it Is_not* true. If you are going to tell lies it is best to check that they are at the very least *possible*, which the so-called " resurrection is not. It is absurd bordering on insane to suppose that you get brownie points for asserting that that what cannot possibly be true to be true, and tends to lead others to suppose that both you and your religion are insane; if only loonies go for it b perhaps best have nothing to do with it. The indubitable truth, is that if the process of the sacred Rascooarno occurs to any being, or as they say ‘if someone dies’and is moreover buried, then this being will never exist again,nor furthermore will he ever speak or teach again. To say or suggest otherwise is insane and tends to make others suppose that the religion that makes insane assertions is itself insane and the be avoided like the plague. The resurrection lie was a *Silly* lie to invent because it cannot_possibly* be true, and thus can only harm the teaching of the method of jesus- whatever that was, not that faith has anything to do with that dreadful weakness of men(human being/dreaming machines)*belief* which is a stupefying factor because faith and belief are *exact_opposites* If you go about say that you suppose that what is well-know, as a matter of common-sense to be impossible, people will inevitably doubt your sanity and you make a fool of whatever led you to that. There is *no* essential difference in saying that you believe that jesus rose from the dead and saying that you believe that jesus ate his own head sandwiched between two unicorns while standing on his own shoulders. I mean it kindly when I say that you do nothing but *harm* to whatever merit there may be in Christianity if you bundle it with assertions that *simply cannot* be true. *Of_ course* people will suppose both you and your religion to be insane if you go about saying insane things about it. Have you any experience of beings thinking suposing or beliieving that they are doing whatever they mean by " good", but are in fact and practice doing nothing but harm? *Do* you suppose you get brownie points for saying you believe that which could not by any stretch of the imagination could be true and is the idea that the moreinsane impossible and wildly umprobable the belirf the better? And you wonder why other people suppose both you and your religion t be insane! I di not mean to be unkind but have you *no* common sense? People both can and do lie, moreover:f it*cannot_ possibly* be true, it *Is_not* true. Now do yourself a favour and use the common sense god gave you. It is not clever likeable or virtuous t be insane. god sent me to put you straight and help you.

  • @JungleJargon
    @JungleJargon ปีที่แล้ว

    *Solution to the "Time Light Problem"* The reason why people often stumble over the *assumption* that light years in outer space equals the same measure of distance and passage of time on earth is because general relativity is not being taken into account. In general relativity, the local rate of time and the measure of distance depend on the amount of matter or mass in the vicinity. Locally, the rate of time and measure of distance doesn't change much inside of our galaxy. However, the distance in our line of sight between us and distant galaxies is extreme and running at a much faster rate of time outside of the galaxy as well as an expanded measure of distance compared to where we are near Sagittarius A's Milky Way black hole (where our rate of time is much slower and our measure of distance is much more contracted). The same way the earth appears flat locally, our universe also appears to be flat locally. However, over great distances throughout the universe there are differing measures of distance and differing rates of time from black holes to the lagrange points between black holes where there is very little acceleration compared to our relatively flat contracted local frames of reference near Sagittarius A. When we observe other galaxies, we are effectively looking at vastly differing measures of time and distance relative to our local observations within the gravitational force of the mass of the Milky Way galaxy. This can lead to various observed phenomena as we look into outer space such as redshift, superluminal motion and the apparent faster motion of the outer spiral arms of galaxies. It's not the same as our flat observations of cats and dogs locally here on earth where we don't observe differing measures of distance and time. So the supposed expansion of the universe, imaginary inflatons, invisible dark matter and dark energy or vacuum energy are *not* required to explain the observed redshift of light from distant galaxies or the faster than expected motion of the outer spiral arms of galaxies. As predicted by general relativity, the expanded space between galaxies due to the absence of matter in our line of sight where much less acceleration can explain the observed redshift without the need for a nonsensical universe expanding into oblivion for no apparent reason and it explains the faster than expected motion of structures and objects the farther it is from supermassive black holes. It turns out that the vacuum energy of space is due to the frame dragging of black holes that are growing from gobbling up spacetime regardless of the amount of matter being consumed. Recent findings of a team of scientists have found that dark energy or vacuum energy is associated with supermassive black holes that are all growing in size, as opposed to an ever expanding universe. Supermassive black holes are the most powerful forces in the universe with far reaching effects of gravity and vacuum energy. The problem and solution is that between galaxies, all of the galaxies all around are all together pulling and drawing in spacetime as well as exerting equal gravitational forces on empty space. This is the reason there is very little acceleration between galaxies and where there is expanded distance and a faster rate of time. The clocks are running faster outside of galaxies and the measuring sticks are larger. As predicted by general relativity, the expanded space between galaxies due to the absence of matter in our line of sight where there is less acceleration explains the observed redshift without the need for a nonsensical universe expanding into oblivion for no apparent reason at all. The differing rates of time and differing measures of distance also explain *how* a day is the same as a thousand years and a thousand years is the same as a day, at the same time in the same universe. 13.8 billion years is the same as 6,000 years and 6,000 years is the same as 13.8 billion years *within the same created universe!*

  • @fennek5351
    @fennek5351 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your great work!

  • @robertajacksonjackson5007
    @robertajacksonjackson5007 ปีที่แล้ว

    God bless you Nancy what a wonderful testimony ! ❤

  • @kristysullivan9540
    @kristysullivan9540 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for sharing Nancy. 💕

  • @selamoa8141
    @selamoa8141 ปีที่แล้ว

    Truly appreciate your ministry. God bless.

  • @NYDogLady
    @NYDogLady ปีที่แล้ว

    Any time you decide to keep going with your message, I'll gladly listen

  • @Chris-vc4by
    @Chris-vc4by ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the testimony Joseph! Very inspirational.

  • @kristysullivan9540
    @kristysullivan9540 ปีที่แล้ว

    Happy Easter everyone!!!

  • @cavaradossi7761
    @cavaradossi7761 ปีที่แล้ว

    We ARE related to broccoli. This guy's a cretin. Poor delusional, infantile, prudish christians who believe in fairy tales. Sad sack humans.

  • @davidfaumuina9866
    @davidfaumuina9866 ปีที่แล้ว

    The skins that covered Adam and Eve in the garden could have been potentially the first sacrificial Bloodshed to cover our nakedness

  • @kristysullivan9540
    @kristysullivan9540 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Abel.

  • @paulhaynes3688
    @paulhaynes3688 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mr Lisle only preaches to his deluded flock . Has he got the bottle to debate against the likes of AronRa l doubt it as he would be made to look like the con man he undoubtedly is

  • @paulhaynes3688
    @paulhaynes3688 ปีที่แล้ว

    This man only preaches to his deluded flock . Never puts himself forward for a genuine debate with opponents. Hardly surprising when you here his deluded opinions