วีดีโอ

A couple of major issues with the example of axioms presented for "conservatives" and "liberals": Actual principled conservatives absolutely care about Morality. Their moral axioms just do not necessarily line up with Liberals or "Progressives" in certain areas, or how they should be applied. Some liberals and progressives absolutely do advocate for policies that treat people of different skin colors differently, presumably to address past injustices, in order to restore "equity". Principled conservatives balk at this idea, because it violates the idea of treating different people differently. Many liberals also view "Morality" as a tool that was used to control the masses, and favor moral relativism over traditional understandings of morality and maximizing their conception of freedom instead. The examples shown of "conservatives" (Trump, Vance) are hardly actual principled conservatives that adhere to real axioms. Most of them are simply morally and principally bankrupt grifters who flip or flop based on what conveniences them. Was looking forward to this video, but the errors and presumptions made in the first three minutes were a bit discouraging.

I loved this! Can’t wait for the next episodes. Great job Dr. thank you for sharing

Very well done!

Excited for the rest of the series. Hope the rest come out soon.

What a great man and an amazing public speaker!

Very well articulated! Thank you.

Dr Zack, do you really think that the kind of honest you suggest could have saved face for Blair in Paxman´s interview was really possible? Can you quote any other politicians who have been thus honest?

Great video, really educational and informative. Well done Zack Hassan. Thank you.

thank u man

Given the current state of politics.. we never deserved this man

As someone who has no interest in watching Andrew Tate's videos, I'm highly appreciative of this balance appraisal. As a teacher I wished better to understand what some of my students are turning to-sometimes understandably if mostly to their own destruction.

Your theory is not scientific, there is no such thing called gay genes, don't try to justify your sexual choice by bringing non scientific evidences..homosexuality is a sexual choice, god didnt create you gay

Undoubtedly! Obama’s speaking techniques are incredibly accessible. I’ve tried incorporating repetition in my own talks, and it really does help keep the audience engaged. His knack for using contrast, like juxtaposition and antithesis, makes his messages stick. I learned a lot about these strategies in the Sense of Humor Improvement Program by Habit10x-it's all about weaving techniques into everyday conversations. With practice, anyone can elevate their communication skills to that level. Keep exploring these techniques; you'll find your own voice shine through!

World and history has only thought about war let us think about peace may be it might not work who cares

I love your conclusion. Extremely insightful and profound food for thought!

Maybe because it would be unethical to conduct experiments on pregnant women because of the high risk of harm to the mother and child associated with things like experimental drugs, experimental procedures, etc 🤔

Just WOW!. P.K, what an insightful and motivational discussion. Can't thank you enough ❤ Thank you Z.H for arranging this discussion

Its not even debatable now that genes do not determine homosexuality. Its proven through medical research before you even look at theology. What a distorted message on this video

New subscriber here and this is my favourite of your videos :) I hadn't seen those clips of Dawkins and Hitchens before and to me they were quite cringey to watch - I know the argument that atheism is arrogant is nuanced but to me this is how people like this can sometimes come across (Sam Harris especially). The world needs more intellectual humility like you have here. Super interesting topic. Looking forward to your next one!

Hard work but less views

Antithesis,parallelism,anaphora,juxtaposition,use of idioms,simple and exact diction,

No they are not

You could also choose the Scandinavian model.

Obama Consiedert as one of the most 100 Infenucial People World wide he and his Wife are the meisters of Craft

Nice analysis! It just occurred to me that skilled rappers also use a lot of these techniques.

Amazing video👍👍 subscribed + notification

Great video, but the music is too loud.

Your explanation are so fancy. A recommendation "Use simple explanation " with simple words. Like unity, comparaison

Brother Hassan you use hard to understand words

People need to realize that homosexuality is caused by scientific factors. It is not a choice. If you call being scientifically differently orientated a sin, thrn something is wrong with your religion.

We Don't Want Two Men At The White House Any

Dear Zack, you should listen to your self. Unnecessary annoying music, unnecessary annoying sounds. Low self esteem or just American crab.

Unnecessary annoying stupid music.

Thank you 🙏 great 👍 explanation ☝️maybe❤or care for what you do might lead you great 👍 speaker ☝️👋☮️

Excellent content, excellent research and excellent presentation. I love to call you my excellence. You have done the great work.

The description does not have the link for your class. It says that the link for your 6 day class is coming soon.

Trump is nothing.

Credit the speaker!

Maybe he is just reading his teleprompter?

Silver tounged dog.....could sell ice cubes to an Eskimo.......

Clinton is also a great speaker. He has the ability to implying complex concepts. The art of public speaking has been analyzed since one the best in history:Cicero

Obama is the last of International STATESMAN seen in the Horizon !!

All I know is that Barak and Michelle were absolutely amazing. Hey, Fugly Trump, THAT'S how you give a speech.

His skill COMMANDS attention.

Hi, i m from Indonesia, saya suka presiden Amerika Obama, publik speaking nya bagus dan menenangkan. Susunan kata dan intonasi nya jelas. Saya ingin belajar dari nya😊

I’d love to hear this speaker critique one of Trump’s speeches.

Very helpful - thanks a lot 🙂

He was a good speaker and had charisma but i think that also was his problems at times that the ”bigger then life” Persona stood in the way of some of the things he did good enough but it also stood in the way of other things were i feel he seenmed to not ”have his feat on the ground” not saying he did not have his feet on the ground only that his speeches sort of gave the impression of a ”bigger then life” promise and i think the next ones should focus more as a team and i got to be honest i am not to hung up if someone is not so good at small talk in interviews or if they need more practice or needs to Get better at improv since so many politicans are but then what they say turns into this negative me,me,me spiral, and it at times dont match how they present themselfs, i mean if youv got someone who is not some Expert at small talk i guess they can try to practice or Get better or improv or whatever but at the same time i am a bit like i dont care to much if some politican says something ‘ Edgy and over the top’ at all times since i feel that can Get tiredsom to, i think the one who is next should see it as more like a team to not feel so alone on the job but work on the difficulty of the practical stuff but to also remain optemistic and opne to solving things instead of this self destruktive and extrem way the other one ( at least for now thats my impression with a few of them, hopefully they can recover) but its sort of tiering with the negative and drama queen talk from some of them ( this might not be a good advice but its just something iv noticed)

Drake big bubba!!!!

3rd place out off 100